PortfoliosLab logo
MGLBX vs. MACSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MGLBX and MACSX is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MGLBX vs. MACSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) and Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund (MACSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
139.11%
269.04%
MGLBX
MACSX

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


MGLBX

YTD

6.84%

1M

20.50%

6M

7.68%

1Y

20.08%

5Y*

9.00%

10Y*

7.13%

MACSX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MGLBX vs. MACSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGLBX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MACSX's 1.13% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MGLBX vs. MACSX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGLBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MGLBX is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MGLBX is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MGLBX is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MGLBX is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MGLBX is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MGLBX is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MACSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MACSX is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MACSX is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MACSX is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MACSX is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MACSX is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MACSX is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MGLBX vs. MACSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) and Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund (MACSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.00
0.87
MGLBX
MACSX

Dividends

MGLBX vs. MACSX - Dividend Comparison

MGLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while MACSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MGLBX
Marsico Global Fund
1.60%1.71%1.98%4.37%17.97%2.45%0.00%1.16%9.25%0.00%11.04%12.83%
MACSX
Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund
4.22%3.52%2.74%1.67%1.28%1.50%2.26%2.32%2.64%10.84%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MGLBX vs. MACSX - Drawdown Comparison


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-3.80%
-84.21%
MGLBX
MACSX

Volatility

MGLBX vs. MACSX - Volatility Comparison

Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) has a higher volatility of 14.03% compared to Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund (MACSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MGLBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MACSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.03%
0
MGLBX
MACSX