PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGIAX vs. HEFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGIAX vs. HEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund (MGIAX) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGIAX achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than HEFA's 14.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MGIAX has underperformed HEFA with an annualized return of 9.87%, while HEFA has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.


MGIAX

1D
-0.86%
1M
2.15%
6M
3.00%
YTD
8.00%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
9.87%
ALL TIME*
8.71%

HEFA

1D
0.40%
1M
0.61%
6M
9.27%
YTD
14.45%
1Y
30.94%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
12.79%
ALL TIME*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$19.94M$30.84M$25.49M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MGIAX vs. HEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGIAX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund
8.00%32.75%7.07%17.76%-23.24%10.25%20.16%25.57%-9.22%26.82%
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
14.45%24.58%13.71%20.33%-4.86%19.59%2.09%27.63%-9.33%16.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MGIAX and HEFA is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2014

0.76

The correlation between MGIAX and HEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGIAX vs. HEFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGIAX
MGIAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MGIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MGIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

HEFA
HEFA Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGIAX vs. HEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund (MGIAX) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGIAXHEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.44

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.27

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

13.64

-8.10

MGIAX vs. HEFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the HEFA Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGIAX and HEFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGIAX vs. HEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGIAX drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, which is greater than HEFA's maximum drawdown of -32.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGIAX and HEFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGIAXHEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.94%

-32.39%

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-9.52%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.57%

-14.28%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.13%

-14.79%

-22.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.13%

-32.39%

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-0.35%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-4.13%

-4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

2.27%

+1.52%

Volatility

MGIAX vs. HEFA - Volatility Comparison

MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund (MGIAX) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) at 3.48%. This indicates that MGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGIAXHEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

3.48%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

10.86%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

13.02%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

13.85%

+3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

15.67%

-0.12%

MGIAX vs. HEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGIAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than HEFA's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGIAX vs. HEFA - Dividend Comparison

MGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, more than HEFA's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
4.01%4.40%3.09%3.02%25.14%3.06%2.10%7.56%4.58%2.55%3.17%3.54%
MGIAX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund
7.67%8.28%12.79%11.81%14.57%7.59%5.30%3.89%4.41%2.48%1.62%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGIAX and HEFA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGIAX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to HEFA (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGIAX dropped -51.94% vs HEFA's -32.39%.

HEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGIAX and HEFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer