MGGPX vs. VT
MGGPX (Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MGGPX tracks the MSCI All Country World Index while VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGGPX returned 13.32%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGGPX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
MGGPX vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGGPX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 10.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MGGPX having a 13.32% annualized return and VT not far behind at 12.96%.
MGGPX
- 1D
- -3.72%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- -10.48%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
VT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 24.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
MGGPX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGGPX Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A | 1.92% | 0.77% | 27.16% | 49.29% | -41.77% | -0.05% | 55.05% | 35.03% | -5.96% | 49.03% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 10.01% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGGPX and VT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2010 | 0.82 |
The correlation between MGGPX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGGPX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
MGGPX
VT
MGGPX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGGPX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.33 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 2.50 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 10.81 | -11.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGGPX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGGPX drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, roughly equal to the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGGPX and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGGPX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.83% | -50.27% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.32% | -9.67% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.32% | -16.51% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.14% | -26.38% | -24.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.83% | -34.24% | -17.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.94% | -2.84% | -11.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -7.00% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.25% | 2.23% | +11.02% |
Volatility
MGGPX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 5.65%. This indicates that MGGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGGPX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | 5.65% | +5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.07% | 11.29% | +6.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 13.56% | +10.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 16.19% | +10.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 17.20% | +6.03% |
MGGPX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGGPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGGPX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
MGGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGGPX Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.95% | 2.27% | 24.31% | 5.14% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 0.40% | 7.23% | 1.29% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGGPX and VT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGGPX has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to VT (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGGPX dropped -51.83% vs VT's -50.27%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGGPX and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer