MGA.TO vs. LNR.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA.TO) and Linamar Corporation (LNR.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MGA.TO or LNR.TO.
Key characteristics
| MGA.TO | LNR.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -7.32% | 4.09% |
| 1Y Return | 100.00% | 4.11% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 28.41% | -2.96% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 30.86% | 7.13% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.16% | 2.96% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.53 | 0.21 |
| Daily Std Dev | 72.53% | 26.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.42% | -92.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -95.59% | -22.04% |
Fundamentals
| MGA.TO | LNR.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$139.07M | CA$4.09B |
| EPS | CA$0.00 | CA$8.17 |
| PE Ratio | 0.00 | 8.13 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$0.00 | CA$9.73B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$0.00 | CA$974.81M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -CA$3.68M | CA$1.27B |
Correlation
The correlation between MGA.TO and LNR.TO is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MGA.TO vs. LNR.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MGA.TO achieves a -7.32% return, which is significantly lower than LNR.TO's 4.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MGA.TO has outperformed LNR.TO with an annualized return of 6.16%, while LNR.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.96% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MGA.TO vs. LNR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA.TO) and Linamar Corporation (LNR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MGA.TO vs. LNR.TO - Dividend Comparison
MGA.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGA.TO Mega Uranium Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LNR.TO Linamar Corporation | 1.37% | 1.37% | 1.31% | 0.91% | 0.53% | 0.98% | 1.06% | 0.66% | 0.69% | 0.54% | 0.56% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
MGA.TO vs. LNR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGA.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, which is greater than LNR.TO's maximum drawdown of -92.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGA.TO and LNR.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MGA.TO vs. LNR.TO - Volatility Comparison
Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA.TO) has a higher volatility of 24.31% compared to Linamar Corporation (LNR.TO) at 5.64%. This indicates that MGA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MGA.TO vs. LNR.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mega Uranium Ltd. and Linamar Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities