PortfoliosLab logo
MFUS vs. BCD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and BCD is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MFUS vs. BCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MFUS:

0.76

BCD:

0.04

Sortino Ratio

MFUS:

1.17

BCD:

0.41

Omega Ratio

MFUS:

1.17

BCD:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

MFUS:

0.83

BCD:

0.15

Martin Ratio

MFUS:

3.34

BCD:

0.57

Ulcer Index

MFUS:

3.84%

BCD:

5.26%

Daily Std Dev

MFUS:

16.97%

BCD:

12.87%

Max Drawdown

MFUS:

-35.21%

BCD:

-29.79%

Current Drawdown

MFUS:

-1.51%

BCD:

-10.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than BCD's 5.36% return.


MFUS

YTD

5.08%

1M

9.68%

6M

2.94%

1Y

12.87%

3Y*

13.56%

5Y*

16.42%

10Y*

N/A

BCD

YTD

5.36%

1M

0.40%

6M

6.43%

1Y

0.50%

3Y*

-2.16%

5Y*

15.52%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFUS vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MFUS vs. BCD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MFUS is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MFUS is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MFUS is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MFUS is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MFUS is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MFUS is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BCD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCD is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCD is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCD is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCD is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCD is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCD is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MFUS vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MFUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the BCD Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUS and BCD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MFUS vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than BCD's 3.42% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.52%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.99%1.01%
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
3.42%3.60%4.51%5.21%8.30%1.29%1.56%1.59%0.07%

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than BCD's maximum drawdown of -29.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and BCD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MFUS vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) at 3.35%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...