MFRFX vs. TCAF
MFRFX (MFS Research Fund) and TCAF (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, MFRFX returned 19.90% vs 20.51% for TCAF. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFRFX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for TCAF.
Performance
MFRFX vs. TCAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFRFX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly higher than TCAF's 6.51% return.
MFRFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
TCAF
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFRFX vs. TCAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MFRFX MFS Research Fund | 7.13% | 12.80% | 18.77% | 9.24% |
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 6.51% | 15.45% | 20.93% | 8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFRFX and TCAF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between MFRFX and TCAF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFRFX vs. TCAF — Risk / Return Rank
MFRFX
TCAF
MFRFX vs. TCAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Research Fund (MFRFX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFRFX | TCAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 1.82 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | 7.28 | +1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFRFX | TCAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 1.80 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.26 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
MFRFX vs. TCAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFRFX drawdown since its inception was -56.15%, which is greater than TCAF's maximum drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFRFX and TCAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFRFX | TCAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.15% | -16.37% | -39.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -11.33% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.97% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.45% | -2.06% | -12.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.82% | -0.60% |
Volatility
MFRFX vs. TCAF - Volatility Comparison
MFS Research Fund (MFRFX) has a higher volatility of 2.58% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) at 2.43%. This indicates that MFRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFRFX | TCAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 2.43% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 8.75% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 11.47% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 13.94% | +2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 13.94% | +3.66% |
MFRFX vs. TCAF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFRFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAF's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFRFX vs. TCAF - Dividend Comparison
MFRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.02%, more than TCAF's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFRFX MFS Research Fund | 15.02% | 16.09% | 10.04% | 6.68% | 7.56% | 5.43% | 5.09% | 3.68% | 12.52% | 8.80% | 4.63% | 6.98% |
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.43% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, MFRFX and TCAF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MFRFX has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to TCAF (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFRFX dropped -56.15% vs TCAF's -16.37%.
TCAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFRFX and TCAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer