PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFIC vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MFIC vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIC achieves a -9.28% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, MFIC has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 6.66%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.27% annualized return.


MFIC

1D
-1.01%
1M
-3.93%
6M
-8.64%
YTD
-9.28%
1Y
-16.13%
3Y*
2.40%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
6.66%

^GSPC

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.13%
6M
7.71%
YTD
9.79%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFIC vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment Corporation
-9.28%-4.34%11.25%35.48%0.19%33.67%-28.54%56.97%-18.11%6.51%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.79%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MFIC and ^GSPC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2004

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between MFIC and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFIC vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFIC
MFIC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MFIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFIC Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MFIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFIC Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFIC vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFIC^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.29

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

2.21

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.60

9.61

-11.21

MFIC vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFIC Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFIC and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFIC vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIC drawdown since its inception was -87.97%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIC and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFIC^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.97%

-56.78%

-31.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.46%

-9.10%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.97%

-18.90%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.97%

-25.43%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.77%

-33.92%

-33.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.71%

-1.24%

-19.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.53%

-10.71%

-6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.07%

2.09%

+7.98%

Volatility

MFIC vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.96%. This indicates that MFIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFIC^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

3.96%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.35%

9.99%

+10.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.18%

12.57%

+11.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.82%

17.01%

+5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.01%

18.05%

+11.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFIC and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFIC has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to ^GSPC (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFIC dropped -87.97% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFIC and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer