PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFG vs. NTDOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MFG vs. NTDOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFG achieves a 26.78% return, which is significantly higher than NTDOY's -31.79% return. Over the past 10 years, MFG has outperformed NTDOY with an annualized return of 14.51%, while NTDOY has yielded a comparatively lower 12.58% annualized return.


MFG

1D
2.77%
1M
9.05%
YTD
26.78%
6M
27.82%
1Y
67.43%
3Y*
49.36%
5Y*
28.58%
10Y*
14.51%

NTDOY

1D
2.22%
1M
-4.64%
YTD
-31.79%
6M
-44.15%
1Y
-43.74%
3Y*
2.42%
5Y*
-5.26%
10Y*
12.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFG vs. NTDOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
26.78%54.60%47.85%26.14%17.09%2.40%-15.06%3.00%-17.58%3.21%
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
-31.79%16.19%13.11%24.66%-10.74%-27.51%61.36%50.76%-26.56%76.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MFG and NTDOY is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2006

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MFG:

$113.22B

NTDOY:

$53.27B

EPS

MFG:

$101.00

NTDOY:

$92.44

PE Ratio

MFG:

0.09

NTDOY:

0.12

PEG Ratio

MFG:

0.00

NTDOY:

0.02

PS Ratio

MFG:

0.01

NTDOY:

0.02

PB Ratio

MFG:

0.01

NTDOY:

0.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

MFG:

$8.66T

NTDOY:

$2.34T

Gross Profit (TTM)

MFG:

$4.12T

NTDOY:

$921.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

MFG:

$1.63T

NTDOY:

$500.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFG vs. NTDOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFG
MFG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NTDOY
NTDOY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NTDOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTDOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTDOY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NTDOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTDOY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFG vs. NTDOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFGNTDOYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

-1.12

+3.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

-1.72

+4.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.81

+0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

-0.75

+3.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.47

-1.42

+8.89

MFG vs. NTDOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the NTDOY Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFG and NTDOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFGNTDOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

-1.12

+3.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

-0.18

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.35

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.14

-0.13

Drawdowns

MFG vs. NTDOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFG drawdown since its inception was -80.57%, roughly equal to the maximum NTDOY drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFG and NTDOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFGNTDOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.57%

-83.59%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.78%

-58.02%

+33.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.33%

-58.02%

+29.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

-58.02%

+29.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.87%

-58.02%

+8.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.03%

-53.80%

+45.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.93%

-37.57%

-23.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.27%

30.70%

-21.43%

Volatility

MFG vs. NTDOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) is 9.48%, while Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY) has a volatility of 16.97%. This indicates that MFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTDOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFGNTDOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.48%

16.97%

-7.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.60%

30.95%

-7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.30%

39.08%

-8.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.58%

30.10%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.47%

36.30%

-9.83%

Dividends

MFG vs. NTDOY - Dividend Comparison

MFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while NTDOY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.00%2.68%3.20%3.73%4.34%2.76%2.71%0.00%0.00%1.86%3.77%3.10%
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
0.00%0.87%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%0.56%1.23%

Financials

MFG vs. NTDOY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and Nintendo Co ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T20222023202420252026
2.27T
414.65B
(MFG) Total Revenue
(NTDOY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MFG vs. NTDOY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and Nintendo Co ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
51.7%
48.3%
Portfolio components
MFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 2.27T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.

NTDOY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a gross profit of 200.11B and revenue of 414.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

MFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 304.56B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

NTDOY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported an operating income of 60.82B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.

MFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 232.94B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

NTDOY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a net income of 66.39B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MFG and NTDOY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTDOY has higher volatility (16.97%) compared to MFG (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFG dropped -80.57% vs NTDOY's -83.59%.

MFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFG and NTDOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer