MFDX vs. AVUV
MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. MFDX is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFDX returned 9.92%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for AVUV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFDX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
MFDX vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 17.96% return.
MFDX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 23.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUV
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
MFDX vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 9.73% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | 11.07% | 6.90% | 6.14% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 17.96% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFDX and AVUV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between MFDX and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFDX vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFDX
AVUV
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Industrials
MFDX
AVUV
Financial Services
MFDX
AVUV
Basic Materials
MFDX
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
MFDX
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
MFDX
AVUV
Technology
MFDX
AVUV
Communication Services
MFDX
AVUV
Energy
MFDX
AVUV
Utilities
MFDX
AVUV
Healthcare
MFDX
AVUV
Real Estate
MFDX
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFDX vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
MFDX
AVUV
MFDX vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFDX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 4.61 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 13.69 | -5.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFDX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.10 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.47 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.56 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
MFDX vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFDX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -49.42% | +13.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -7.95% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -28.79% | +17.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.58% | -28.79% | +3.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -1.12% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -7.95% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.67% | +0.01% |
Volatility
MFDX vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.08%. This indicates that MFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFDX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 4.08% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 11.34% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 17.54% | -3.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 22.74% | -7.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 28.30% | -11.89% |
MFDX vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFDX vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than AVUV's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.79% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFDX and AVUV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to AVUV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.71% vs 9.92% for MFDX. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.71% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.
MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.29% for AVUV.
MFDX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFDX and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer