MFC vs. WPC
Compare and contrast key facts about undefined (MFC) and undefined (WPC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MFC or WPC.
Performance
MFC vs. WPC - Performance Comparison
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
undefined vs. undefined - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for undefined (undefined) and undefined (undefined). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
MFC vs. WPC - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
MFC vs. WPC - Volatility Comparison
undefined (MFC) has a higher volatility of 11.09% compared to undefined (WPC) at 6.31%. This indicates that MFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.