PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFA vs. NFLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MFA vs. NFLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MFA vs. NFLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
6.89%6.07%2.63%10.45%
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
3.21%1.66%66.37%3.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFA achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly higher than NFLY's 3.21% return.


MFA

1D
3.23%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
6.89%
6M
12.49%
1Y
8.77%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
1.81%

NFLY

1D
1.57%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
3.21%
6M
-16.09%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFA vs. NFLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFA
MFA Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLY
NFLY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
NFLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFA vs. NFLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFANFLYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.31

0.07

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

0.31

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.04

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

0.05

+0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.39

0.10

+1.30

MFA vs. NFLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFA Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the NFLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFA and NFLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFANFLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

0.07

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.89

-0.78

Correlation

The correlation between MFA and NFLY is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MFA vs. NFLY - Dividend Comparison

MFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.03%, less than NFLY's 60.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
15.03%15.47%13.74%12.42%16.95%8.44%8.35%10.46%11.98%10.10%10.48%12.12%
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
60.91%61.53%49.91%11.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MFA vs. NFLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFA drawdown since its inception was -95.52%, which is greater than NFLY's maximum drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFA and NFLY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MFANFLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.52%

-37.18%

-58.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.06%

-37.18%

+16.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.31%

-23.36%

-7.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.48%

-7.37%

-14.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.75%

17.46%

-10.71%

Volatility

MFA vs. NFLY - Volatility Comparison

MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) at 4.66%. This indicates that MFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MFANFLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

4.66%

+3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.75%

22.24%

-6.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.80%

28.94%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.72%

28.39%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.72%

28.39%

+56.33%