PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METV vs. XT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

METV vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and iShares Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

METV vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
-15.18%30.83%24.93%60.57%-52.66%0.40%
XT
iShares Exponential Technologies ETF
-2.28%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%4.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -15.18% return, which is significantly lower than XT's -2.28% return.


METV

1D
4.46%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-15.18%
6M
-22.53%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
10Y*

XT

1D
3.61%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
-2.28%
6M
2.00%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


METV vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

METV vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METV
METV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METV vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and iShares Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METVXTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.34

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.08

1.97

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.27

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.92

-1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.63

9.06

-7.42

METV vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the XT Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and XT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METVXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.34

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.56

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between METV and XT is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

METV vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than XT's 8.13% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
0.21%0.18%0.00%0.17%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XT
iShares Exponential Technologies ETF
8.13%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Drawdowns

METV vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and XT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


METVXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-34.41%

-25.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.27%

-14.11%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.97%

-7.22%

-17.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.41%

-7.50%

-18.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.62%

2.99%

+7.63%

Volatility

METV vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to iShares Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 7.04%. This indicates that METV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


METVXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.46%

7.04%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.94%

12.38%

+6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.94%

20.87%

+8.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.23%

20.68%

+9.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.23%

20.02%

+10.21%