PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METV vs. ESPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METV vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -13.31% return.


METV

1D
-1.29%
1M
5.65%
YTD
1.54%
6M
-2.08%
1Y
20.08%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
10Y*

ESPO

1D
-2.20%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
-13.31%
6M
-16.99%
1Y
-11.55%
3Y*
19.46%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METV vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
1.54%30.83%24.93%60.57%-52.66%0.40%
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
-13.31%25.79%47.61%33.64%-34.71%-5.59%

Correlation

The correlation between METV and ESPO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.84

The correlation between METV and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

METV vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
METV
ESPO

Technology

50.4%
8.2%

Communication Services

38.1%
78.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
13.8%

Financial Services

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

METV
50.4%
ESPO
8.2%

Communication Services

METV
38.1%
ESPO
78.1%

Consumer Cyclical

METV
8.2%
ESPO
13.8%

Financial Services

METV
3.3%
ESPO

-

Basic Materials

METV

-

ESPO

-

Consumer Defensive

METV

-

ESPO

-

Energy

METV

-

ESPO

-

Healthcare

METV

-

ESPO

-

Industrials

METV

-

ESPO

-

Real Estate

METV

-

ESPO

-

Utilities

METV

-

ESPO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METV vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METV
METV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METV vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METVESPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.91

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

-0.42

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

-0.76

+2.39

METV vs. ESPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the ESPO Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and ESPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METVESPODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

-0.62

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.63

-0.47

Drawdowns

METV vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and ESPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METVESPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-50.99%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.27%

-27.81%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-27.81%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.18%

-25.66%

+15.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.00%

-15.03%

-10.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.29%

15.30%

-3.01%

Volatility

METV vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 5.00%. This indicates that METV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METVESPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

5.00%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.67%

14.58%

+3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.88%

18.85%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.96%

25.12%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.96%

25.75%

+4.21%

METV vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

METV vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than ESPO's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
1.44%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
0.18%0.18%0.00%0.17%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


METV and ESPO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

METV has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to ESPO (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METV dropped -59.64% vs ESPO's -50.99%.

On 3-year performance, METV leads with 23.94% vs 19.46% for ESPO. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, METV has performed better with a 23.94% return vs 19.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.

ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.18% for METV.

METV is categorized as Technology Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.55% for ESPO.

METV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METV and ESPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer