METV vs. ESPO
METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, METV returned 23.94%/yr vs 19.46%/yr for ESPO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. METV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
METV vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -13.31% return.
METV
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- 20.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -13.31%
- 6M
- -16.99%
- 1Y
- -11.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
METV vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 1.54% | 30.83% | 24.93% | 60.57% | -52.66% | 0.40% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -13.31% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between METV and ESPO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between METV and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
METV vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
METV
ESPO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
METV
ESPO
Communication Services
METV
ESPO
Consumer Cyclical
METV
ESPO
Financial Services
METV
ESPO
-
Basic Materials
METV
-
ESPO
-
Consumer Defensive
METV
-
ESPO
-
Energy
METV
-
ESPO
-
Healthcare
METV
-
ESPO
-
Industrials
METV
-
ESPO
-
Real Estate
METV
-
ESPO
-
Utilities
METV
-
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METV vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
METV
ESPO
METV vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METV | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.91 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | -0.42 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | -0.76 | +2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METV | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | -0.62 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.63 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
METV vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METV | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -50.99% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.27% | -27.81% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.27% | -27.81% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.18% | -25.66% | +15.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.00% | -15.03% | -10.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.29% | 15.30% | -3.01% |
Volatility
METV vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 5.00%. This indicates that METV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METV | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 5.00% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | 14.58% | +3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.88% | 18.85% | +5.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 25.12% | +4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 25.75% | +4.21% |
METV vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
METV vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than ESPO's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.44% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METV and ESPO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METV has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to ESPO (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METV dropped -59.64% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 3-year performance, METV leads with 23.94% vs 19.46% for ESPO. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, METV has performed better with a 23.94% return vs 19.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.18% for METV.
METV is categorized as Technology Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.55% for ESPO.
METV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METV and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer