METC vs. GOLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Gold.com, Inc (GOLD).
Performance
METC vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
METC vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | -14.11% | 13.28% |
GOLD Gold.com, Inc | 18.11% | 14.34% |
Fundamentals
METC:
-$1.55
GOLD:
$0.48
METC:
0.96
GOLD:
0.07
METC:
$536.62M
GOLD:
$15.68B
METC:
$5.58M
GOLD:
$288.97M
METC:
$20.61M
GOLD:
$6.19M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -14.11% return, which is significantly lower than GOLD's 18.11% return.
METC
- 1D
- 7.14%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- -14.11%
- 6M
- -53.42%
- 1Y
- 102.29%
- 3Y*
- 28.59%
- 5Y*
- 34.92%
- 10Y*
- —
GOLD
- 1D
- 5.53%
- 1M
- -30.26%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METC vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank
METC
GOLD
METC vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and Gold.com, Inc (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METC | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METC | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 2.40 | -2.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between METC and GOLD is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
METC vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison
METC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than GOLD's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | 0.44% | 1.10% | 5.32% | 2.91% | 5.11% |
GOLD Gold.com, Inc | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
METC vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and GOLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| METC | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.54% | -40.58% | -44.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.66% | -37.30% | -34.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.18% | -9.26% | -40.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.84% | — | — |
Volatility
METC vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| METC | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.11% | 64.88% | +38.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.38% | 64.88% | +17.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.99% | 64.88% | +11.11% |
Financials
METC vs. GOLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Gold.com, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
METC vs. GOLD - Profitability Comparison
METC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 128.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GOLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gold.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 93.37M and revenue of 6.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.4%.
METC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -15.61M and revenue of 128.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.2%.
GOLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gold.com, Inc reported an operating income of 41.17M and revenue of 6.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.6%.
METC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -14.71M and revenue of 128.01M, resulting in a net margin of -11.5%.
GOLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gold.com, Inc reported a net income of 11.64M and revenue of 6.48B, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.