PortfoliosLab logo
METC vs. AMRK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between METC and AMRK is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

METC vs. AMRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (AMRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

METC:

-0.33

AMRK:

-0.94

Sortino Ratio

METC:

-0.04

AMRK:

-1.45

Omega Ratio

METC:

0.99

AMRK:

0.81

Calmar Ratio

METC:

-0.39

AMRK:

-0.81

Martin Ratio

METC:

-0.92

AMRK:

-1.43

Ulcer Index

METC:

29.05%

AMRK:

31.33%

Daily Std Dev

METC:

77.78%

AMRK:

43.41%

Max Drawdown

METC:

-85.54%

AMRK:

-62.90%

Current Drawdown

METC:

-56.51%

AMRK:

-53.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

METC:

$499.79M

AMRK:

$527.71M

EPS

METC:

-$0.08

AMRK:

$1.57

PEG Ratio

METC:

0.00

AMRK:

0.00

PS Ratio

METC:

0.80

AMRK:

0.05

PB Ratio

METC:

1.44

AMRK:

0.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

METC:

$628.27M

AMRK:

$10.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

METC:

$104.33M

AMRK:

$169.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

METC:

$63.78M

AMRK:

$43.25M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METC achieves a -7.72% return, which is significantly higher than AMRK's -20.52% return.


METC

YTD

-7.72%

1M

-5.47%

6M

-22.08%

1Y

-27.33%

5Y*

41.24%

10Y*

N/A

AMRK

YTD

-20.52%

1M

-9.08%

6M

-24.65%

1Y

-43.25%

5Y*

28.21%

10Y*

18.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

METC vs. AMRK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of METC is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of METC is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of METC is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of METC is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of METC is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of METC is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

AMRK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMRK is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMRK is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMRK is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMRK is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMRK is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMRK is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

METC vs. AMRK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) and A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (AMRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current METC Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is higher than the AMRK Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METC and AMRK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

METC vs. AMRK - Dividend Comparison

METC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than AMRK's 3.73% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
4.39%3.98%2.86%6.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMRK
A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.
3.73%2.92%5.95%3.46%3.27%11.70%0.00%0.68%2.18%1.44%1.06%

Drawdowns

METC vs. AMRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METC drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than AMRK's maximum drawdown of -62.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METC and AMRK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

METC vs. AMRK - Volatility Comparison

Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a higher volatility of 19.70% compared to A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (AMRK) at 16.94%. This indicates that METC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

METC vs. AMRK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20212022202320242025
134.66M
3.01B
(METC) Total Revenue
(AMRK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

METC vs. AMRK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ramaco Resources, Inc. and A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
15.2%
1.4%
(METC) Gross Margin
(AMRK) Gross Margin
METC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.52M and revenue of 134.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.2%.

AMRK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.02M and revenue of 3.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.4%.

METC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -12.02M and revenue of 134.66M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.9%.

AMRK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.61M and revenue of 3.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

METC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -9.46M and revenue of 134.66M, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.

AMRK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. reported a net income of -8.55M and revenue of 3.01B, resulting in a net margin of -0.3%.