PortfoliosLab logo
MET vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MET and COST is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MET vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MET:

0.42

COST:

1.30

Sortino Ratio

MET:

0.77

COST:

1.71

Omega Ratio

MET:

1.11

COST:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

MET:

0.60

COST:

1.54

Martin Ratio

MET:

1.90

COST:

4.48

Ulcer Index

MET:

6.93%

COST:

5.94%

Daily Std Dev

MET:

29.42%

COST:

21.84%

Max Drawdown

MET:

-82.93%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

MET:

-8.15%

COST:

-7.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MET:

$54.48B

COST:

$443.25B

EPS

MET:

$6.12

COST:

$17.17

PE Ratio

MET:

13.26

COST:

58.18

PEG Ratio

MET:

1.11

COST:

5.29

PS Ratio

MET:

0.74

COST:

1.68

PB Ratio

MET:

1.98

COST:

17.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

MET:

$72.92B

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MET:

$72.92B

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

MET:

$6.39B

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 8.48% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 8.37%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.42% annualized return.


MET

YTD

-1.00%

1M

10.40%

6M

-1.17%

1Y

12.24%

5Y*

24.42%

10Y*

8.37%

COST

YTD

8.48%

1M

1.38%

6M

6.45%

1Y

28.12%

5Y*

29.32%

10Y*

23.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MET vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MET is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MET is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MET is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MET is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MET is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MET is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MET vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MET Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MET and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MET vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than COST's 0.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MET
MetLife, Inc.
2.75%2.63%3.12%2.74%3.04%3.88%3.41%4.04%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.48%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

MET vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.93%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MET vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 6.11%. This indicates that MET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MET vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
18.28B
63.72B
(MET) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MET vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MetLife, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
15.1%
(MET) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
MET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 18.28B and revenue of 18.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

MET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 18.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

MET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 945.00M and revenue of 18.28B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.