MET vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MET or COST.
Key characteristics
| MET | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.56% | 9.75% |
| 1Y Return | 25.18% | 50.61% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.45% | 26.59% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.37% | 26.47% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.12% | 22.82% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.90 | 2.84 |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.81% | 17.95% |
| Max Drawdown | -82.37% | -70.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.01% | -7.92% |
Fundamentals
| MET | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $50.92B | $323.39B |
| EPS | $1.81 | $15.31 |
| PE Ratio | 38.91 | 47.63 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.11 | 5.15 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $66.90B | $248.83B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $14.89B | $30.10B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $3.92B | $11.07B |
Correlation
The correlation between MET and COST is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MET vs. COST - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MET having a 9.56% return and COST slightly higher at 9.75%. Over the past 10 years, MET has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 8.12%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.82% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MET vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MET vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than COST's 2.80% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.89% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 2.91% | 2.92% | 3.06% | 2.45% | 1.87% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.80% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
MET vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -70.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MET vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 3.55%. This indicates that MET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MET vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities