MEIAX vs. MTUM
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM).
MEIAX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jan 2, 1996. MTUM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. It was launched on Apr 16, 2013.
Performance
MEIAX vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MEIAX vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEIAX MFS Value Fund | 1.01% | 12.97% | 11.60% | 7.92% | -6.25% | 25.11% | 3.71% | 29.73% | -10.11% | 16.97% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | -1.94% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEIAX achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than MTUM's -1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, MEIAX has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 9.65%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.08% annualized return.
MEIAX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 10.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
MTUM
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- -3.82%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MEIAX vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEIAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MEIAX vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
MEIAX
MTUM
MEIAX vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MEIAX | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.94 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 1.42 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.82 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 6.83 | -2.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEIAX | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.94 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.48 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.68 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.73 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between MEIAX and MTUM is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MEIAX vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
MEIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.44%, more than MTUM's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEIAX MFS Value Fund | 9.44% | 9.34% | 9.10% | 8.21% | 7.36% | 3.10% | 2.42% | 2.97% | 3.36% | 3.87% | 2.84% | 5.73% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.80% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Drawdowns
MEIAX vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEIAX drawdown since its inception was -52.85%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEIAX and MTUM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEIAX | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.85% | -34.08% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -12.26% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.72% | -32.28% | +14.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.71% | -34.08% | -2.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.04% | -6.00% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -6.28% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.26% | -0.73% |
Volatility
MEIAX vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) is 3.64%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that MEIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MEIAX | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 8.49% | -4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | 14.74% | -6.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.83% | 23.02% | -8.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 20.39% | -6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 20.83% | -4.28% |