PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEIAX vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEIAX vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEIAX achieves a 3.93% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MEIAX has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 9.56%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.


MEIAX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
3.93%
6M
5.23%
1Y
12.70%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
9.56%

MTUM

1D
-1.10%
1M
11.94%
YTD
30.30%
6M
29.99%
1Y
40.55%
3Y*
34.34%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
17.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEIAX vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEIAX
MFS Value Fund
3.93%12.97%11.60%7.92%-6.25%25.11%3.71%29.73%-10.11%16.97%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
30.30%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MEIAX and MTUM is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between MEIAX and MTUM has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEIAX vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEIAX
MEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEIAX vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEIAXMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.53

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

14.10

-7.87

MEIAX vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEIAX and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEIAXMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.14

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.73

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.82

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.84

-0.26

Drawdowns

MEIAX vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEIAX drawdown since its inception was -52.85%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEIAX and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEIAXMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.85%

-34.08%

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.78%

-11.54%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.26%

-20.99%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.72%

-32.28%

+14.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.71%

-34.08%

-2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-1.10%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-6.21%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.89%

-0.92%

Volatility

MEIAX vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) is 2.24%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that MEIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEIAXMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.24%

7.67%

-5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

16.51%

-8.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.39%

19.08%

-8.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

20.60%

-6.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

21.03%

-4.48%

MEIAX vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEIAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEIAX vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

MEIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIAX
MFS Value Fund
9.17%9.34%9.10%8.21%7.36%3.10%2.42%2.97%3.36%3.87%2.84%5.73%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEIAX and MTUM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to MEIAX (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEIAX dropped -52.85% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEIAX and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer