MEG.TO vs. ATH.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about MEG Energy Corp. (MEG.TO) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MEG.TO or ATH.TO.
Key characteristics
MEG.TO | ATH.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 15.00% | 26.38% |
1Y Return | 9.41% | 39.05% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 33.70% | 54.01% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 37.90% | 67.06% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 0.03% | 4.85% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.17 | 0.90 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.45 | 1.41 |
Omega Ratio | 1.05 | 1.17 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.09 | 0.38 |
Martin Ratio | 0.37 | 4.03 |
Ulcer Index | 14.19% | 7.79% |
Daily Std Dev | 30.78% | 34.99% |
Max Drawdown | -97.68% | -99.44% |
Current Drawdown | -48.33% | -71.68% |
Fundamentals
MEG.TO | ATH.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$7.37B | CA$2.79B |
EPS | CA$2.17 | CA$0.40 |
PE Ratio | 12.59 | 13.20 |
PEG Ratio | -0.12 | 0.20 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$4.31B | CA$964.74M |
Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$915.00M | CA$296.00M |
EBITDA (TTM) | CA$1.13B | CA$340.30M |
Correlation
The correlation between MEG.TO and ATH.TO is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MEG.TO vs. ATH.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MEG.TO achieves a 15.00% return, which is significantly lower than ATH.TO's 26.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MEG.TO has underperformed ATH.TO with an annualized return of 0.03%, while ATH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 4.85% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MEG.TO vs. ATH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MEG Energy Corp. (MEG.TO) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MEG.TO vs. ATH.TO - Dividend Comparison
MEG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | |
---|---|
MEG Energy Corp. | 0.37% |
Athabasca Oil Corporation | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MEG.TO vs. ATH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEG.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.68%, roughly equal to the maximum ATH.TO drawdown of -99.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEG.TO and ATH.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MEG.TO vs. ATH.TO - Volatility Comparison
MEG Energy Corp. (MEG.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) at 8.12%. This indicates that MEG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MEG.TO vs. ATH.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MEG Energy Corp. and Athabasca Oil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities