MED vs. VFC
MED (Medifast, Inc.) and VFC (V.F. Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — MED in Personal Services, VFC in Apparel Manufacturing. Over the past 10 years, MED returned -9.66%/yr vs -10.23%/yr for VFC. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MED vs. VFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MED achieves a -7.96% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MED has outperformed VFC with an annualized return of -9.66%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively lower -10.23% annualized return.
MED
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- 6M
- -14.07%
- YTD
- -7.96%
- 1Y
- -28.51%
- 3Y*
- -53.52%
- 5Y*
- -47.82%
- 10Y*
- -9.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.82%
VFC
- 1D
- -4.28%
- 1M
- -12.15%
- 6M
- -26.13%
- YTD
- -19.96%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- -7.31%
- 5Y*
- -26.75%
- 10Y*
- -10.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.63M | $1.71M | $2.55M | |
| $167.52M | $128.15M | $135.42M |
MED vs. VFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MED Medifast, Inc. | -7.96% | -39.39% | -73.79% | -38.34% | -42.31% | 9.36% | 86.18% | -9.73% | 82.11% | 72.33% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | -19.96% | -13.83% | 16.64% | -28.51% | -60.38% | -12.05% | -12.00% | 51.70% | -1.33% | 42.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MED and VFC is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1993 | 0.20 |
The correlation between MED and VFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MED:
$109.30M
VFC:
$5.63B
MED:
-$1.82
VFC:
$0.89
MED:
0.31
VFC:
0.44
MED:
$346.10M
VFC:
$9.51B
MED:
$242.70M
VFC:
$4.28B
MED:
-$3.86M
VFC:
$826.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MED vs. VFC — Risk / Return Rank
MED
VFC
MED vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medifast, Inc. (MED) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MED | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.13 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 0.75 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 1.85 | -3.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MED vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MED drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than VFC's maximum drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MED and VFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MED | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.40% | -88.41% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.14% | -33.20% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.23% | -63.66% | -26.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.31% | -86.25% | -10.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.79% | -88.41% | -8.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.66% | -82.46% | -14.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.02% | -21.85% | -29.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.35% | 13.49% | +7.86% |
Volatility
MED vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Medifast, Inc. (MED) is 11.42%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that MED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MED | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 22.75% | -11.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.03% | 36.49% | -4.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.01% | 51.32% | -10.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.36% | 54.30% | -8.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 45.42% | +2.44% |
Dividends
MED vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison
MED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MED Medifast, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.36% | 5.69% | 2.71% | 2.30% | 3.08% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 2.57% | 0.82% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 2.51% | 1.99% | 1.68% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 2.87% | 2.14% |
Financials
MED vs. VFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medifast, Inc. and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MED vs. VFC - Profitability Comparison
MED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.76M and revenue of 76.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
VFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.30M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.
VFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
MED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a net income of -2.12M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.
VFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of -106.89M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of -6.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MED and VFC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFC has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to MED (11.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MED dropped -98.40% vs VFC's -88.41%.
VFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MED and VFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer