MEAR vs. USFR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR).
MEAR and USFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MEAR is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Mar 3, 2015. USFR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MEAR or USFR.
Correlation
The correlation between MEAR and USFR is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MEAR vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MEAR:
3.85
USFR:
15.77
MEAR:
6.17
USFR:
55.89
MEAR:
1.85
USFR:
13.90
MEAR:
14.76
USFR:
90.06
MEAR:
58.95
USFR:
766.94
MEAR:
0.06%
USFR:
0.01%
MEAR:
0.92%
USFR:
0.34%
MEAR:
-2.68%
USFR:
-1.36%
MEAR:
-0.13%
USFR:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEAR achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 5.23% return.
MEAR
3.48%
0.13%
1.67%
3.54%
1.73%
N/A
USFR
5.23%
0.40%
2.47%
5.35%
2.58%
2.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MEAR vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MEAR vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MEAR vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
MEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than USFR's 5.22% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 3.43% | 3.30% | 0.88% | 0.30% | 0.90% | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.53% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 5.22% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.04% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MEAR vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEAR drawdown since its inception was -2.68%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEAR and USFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MEAR vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) has a higher volatility of 0.26% compared to WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that MEAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.