PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDYV vs. VIOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDYV vs. VIOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than VIOV's 15.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDYV having a 10.40% annualized return and VIOV not far behind at 10.23%.


MDYV

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.78%
YTD
9.04%
6M
9.24%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
10.40%

VIOV

1D
-1.28%
1M
2.26%
YTD
15.28%
6M
14.76%
1Y
37.06%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYV vs. VIOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
9.04%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%30.51%3.68%25.89%-11.95%12.31%
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
15.28%6.63%7.44%15.36%-11.37%30.67%2.81%24.44%-12.85%11.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYV and VIOV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.90

The correlation between MDYV and VIOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDYV vs. VIOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDYV
VIOV

Financial Services

21.8%
19.8%

Industrials

18.8%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
15.4%

Real Estate

9.6%
8.8%

Technology

9.3%
10.6%

Energy

7.4%
9.1%

Basic Materials

6.0%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
3.8%

Utilities

4.2%
1.9%

Healthcare

3.5%
7.5%

Communication Services

0.5%
3.4%

Financial Services

MDYV
21.8%
VIOV
19.8%

Industrials

MDYV
18.8%
VIOV
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MDYV
13.5%
VIOV
15.4%

Real Estate

MDYV
9.6%
VIOV
8.8%

Technology

MDYV
9.3%
VIOV
10.6%

Energy

MDYV
7.4%
VIOV
9.1%

Basic Materials

MDYV
6.0%
VIOV
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

MDYV
5.5%
VIOV
3.8%

Utilities

MDYV
4.2%
VIOV
1.9%

Healthcare

MDYV
3.5%
VIOV
7.5%

Communication Services

MDYV
0.5%
VIOV
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDYV vs. VIOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VIOV
VIOV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VIOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYV vs. VIOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDYVVIOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

3.99

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

13.00

-6.22

MDYV vs. VIOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the VIOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYV and VIOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDYVVIOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.03

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.26

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.43

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.53

-0.12

Drawdowns

MDYV vs. VIOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than VIOV's maximum drawdown of -47.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and VIOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYVVIOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.71%

-47.36%

-13.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-9.33%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-28.44%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-28.44%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.90%

-47.36%

+1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.28%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-7.38%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.86%

+0.20%

Volatility

MDYV vs. VIOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) is 3.93%, while Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that MDYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYVVIOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.54%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

11.57%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

18.41%

-3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

21.95%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

23.89%

-1.99%

MDYV vs. VIOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDYV vs. VIOV - Dividend Comparison

MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than VIOV's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.73%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
1.59%1.69%1.78%2.18%1.81%1.59%1.42%1.60%1.76%1.43%1.17%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MDYV and VIOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VIOV has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to MDYV (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs VIOV's -47.36%.

On 10-year performance, MDYV leads with 10.40% vs 10.23% for VIOV. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MDYV has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYV.

MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.59% for VIOV.

MDYV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VIOV is Small Cap Value Equities. MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while VIOV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.10% for VIOV.

VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDYV and VIOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer