MDY vs. VBR
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDY is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDY returned 11.05%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for VBR. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VBR.
Performance
MDY vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.02% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 12.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDY having a 11.05% annualized return and VBR not far behind at 10.58%.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 15.05%
- 1Y
- 26.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
VBR
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 12.11%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
MDY vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 14.02% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 12.11% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and VBR is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.96 |
The correlation between MDY and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDY vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
VBR
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
VBR
Technology
MDY
VBR
Financial Services
MDY
VBR
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
VBR
Healthcare
MDY
VBR
Real Estate
MDY
VBR
Energy
MDY
VBR
Basic Materials
MDY
VBR
Consumer Defensive
MDY
VBR
Utilities
MDY
VBR
Communication Services
MDY
VBR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
VBR
MDY vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDY | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 1.84 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 2.70 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.10 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 10.94 | +0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDY | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 1.84 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.49 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.42 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
MDY vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and VBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -61.98% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -8.85% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -24.19% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -24.19% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | -45.28% | +3.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -8.27% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.50% | -0.08% |
Volatility
MDY vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 4.07%. This indicates that MDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 4.07% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 10.46% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.48% | 15.17% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 19.77% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 21.74% | -0.55% |
MDY vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDY vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than VBR's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, MDY and VBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MDY has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to VBR (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs VBR's -61.98%.
On 10-year performance, MDY leads with 11.05% vs 10.58% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MDY has performed better with a 11.05% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.04% for MDY.
MDY is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.05% for VBR.
VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and VBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer