PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDT vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MDT vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medtronic plc (MDT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a -11.50% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 2.13%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.27% annualized return.


MDT

1D
-0.36%
1M
5.14%
6M
-12.31%
YTD
-11.50%
1Y
-4.04%
3Y*
1.71%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*
2.13%

^GSPC

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.13%
6M
7.71%
YTD
9.79%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDT vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDT
Medtronic plc
-11.50%24.05%0.28%9.58%-22.55%-9.79%5.70%27.34%15.18%15.90%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.79%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MDT and ^GSPC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1981

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between MDT and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDT vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDT
MDT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDT vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDT^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.29

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

2.21

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.31

9.61

-9.92

MDT vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDT and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDT vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDT^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.63%

-56.78%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.90%

-9.10%

-19.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.90%

-18.90%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.10%

-25.43%

-19.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.10%

-33.92%

-11.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.69%

-1.24%

-26.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

-10.71%

-5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.93%

2.09%

+10.84%

Volatility

MDT vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Medtronic plc (MDT) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.96%. This indicates that MDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDT^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

3.96%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.92%

9.99%

+7.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

12.57%

+9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.21%

17.01%

+5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.36%

18.05%

+5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDT and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDT has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to ^GSPC (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDT dropped -57.63% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDT and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer