PortfoliosLab logo
MDT vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MDT and ^GSPC is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MDT vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medtronic plc (MDT) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MDT:

0.22

^GSPC:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

MDT:

0.52

^GSPC:

1.01

Omega Ratio

MDT:

1.07

^GSPC:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

MDT:

0.16

^GSPC:

0.65

Martin Ratio

MDT:

0.94

^GSPC:

2.49

Ulcer Index

MDT:

6.52%

^GSPC:

4.96%

Daily Std Dev

MDT:

21.75%

^GSPC:

19.65%

Max Drawdown

MDT:

-57.63%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

MDT:

-27.72%

^GSPC:

-2.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 3.69%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.


MDT

YTD

9.74%

1M

5.29%

6M

0.95%

1Y

4.64%

3Y*

-2.16%

5Y*

0.47%

10Y*

3.69%

^GSPC

YTD

1.39%

1M

12.89%

6M

1.19%

1Y

12.45%

3Y*

15.19%

5Y*

14.95%

10Y*

10.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Medtronic plc

S&P 500

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MDT vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MDT is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MDT is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MDT is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MDT is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MDT is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MDT is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MDT vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDT and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

MDT vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MDT vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Medtronic plc (MDT) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...