PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MD vs. WWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MD vs. WWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MEDNAX, Inc. (MD) and Woodward, Inc. (WWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MD achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than WWD's 41.90% return. Over the past 10 years, MD has underperformed WWD with an annualized return of -10.20%, while WWD has yielded a comparatively higher 23.41% annualized return.


MD

1D
1.45%
1M
12.23%
YTD
11.55%
6M
11.13%
1Y
78.46%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
-5.46%
10Y*
-10.20%

WWD

1D
0.34%
1M
21.88%
YTD
41.90%
6M
35.68%
1Y
77.90%
3Y*
56.23%
5Y*
29.20%
10Y*
23.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MD vs. WWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MD
MEDNAX, Inc.
11.55%63.03%41.08%-37.42%-45.39%10.88%-11.69%-15.79%-38.25%-19.83%
WWD
Woodward, Inc.
41.90%82.58%23.01%41.97%-11.09%-9.43%3.18%60.42%-2.23%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MD and WWD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 1996

0.29

The correlation between MD and WWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MD:

$1.98B

WWD:

$26.32B

EPS

MD:

$2.05

WWD:

$4.00

PE Ratio

MD:

11.64

WWD:

107.10

PEG Ratio

MD:

1.41

WWD:

4.15

PS Ratio

MD:

1.05

WWD:

6.59

PB Ratio

MD:

2.26

WWD:

10.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

MD:

$1.93B

WWD:

$4.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MD:

$385.43M

WWD:

$526.56M

EBITDA (TTM)

MD:

$243.92M

WWD:

$706.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MD vs. WWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MD
MD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

WWD
WWD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
WWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
WWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MD vs. WWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MEDNAX, Inc. (MD) and Woodward, Inc. (WWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDWWDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

5.16

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.65

12.60

-4.95

MD vs. WWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MD Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the WWD Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MD and WWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MD vs. WWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MD drawdown since its inception was -92.08%, which is greater than WWD's maximum drawdown of -83.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MD and WWD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDWWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.08%

-83.18%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.65%

-15.17%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.69%

-19.31%

-35.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.74%

-37.25%

-43.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.13%

-60.61%

-30.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.08%

-1.51%

-70.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-17.85%

-20.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.29%

6.20%

+4.09%

Volatility

MD vs. WWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MEDNAX, Inc. (MD) is 7.25%, while Woodward, Inc. (WWD) has a volatility of 12.08%. This indicates that MD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDWWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.25%

12.08%

-4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.27%

28.95%

-2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.60%

36.09%

+7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.17%

32.19%

+11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.99%

35.40%

+10.59%

Dividends

MD vs. WWD - Dividend Comparison

MD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MD
MEDNAX, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WWD
Woodward, Inc.
0.28%0.37%0.60%0.65%0.79%0.59%0.43%0.55%0.77%0.65%0.64%0.81%

Financials

MD vs. WWD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MEDNAX, Inc. and Woodward, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00M1.00B1.10B20222023202420252026
476.20M
1.09B
(MD) Total Revenue
(WWD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MD vs. WWD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MEDNAX, Inc. and Woodward, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-30.0%-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%202220232024202520260
-26.8%
Portfolio components
MD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MEDNAX, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 476.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WWD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported a gross profit of -292.16M and revenue of 1.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -26.8%.

MD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MEDNAX, Inc. reported an operating income of 41.66M and revenue of 476.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

WWD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported an operating income of -159.42M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in an operating margin of -14.6%.

MD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MEDNAX, Inc. reported a net income of 29.57M and revenue of 476.20M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

WWD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported a net income of -133.72M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in a net margin of -12.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MD and WWD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WWD has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to MD (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MD dropped -92.08% vs WWD's -83.18%.

WWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MD and WWD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer