MCS vs. ACEL
MCS (The Marcus Corporation) and ACEL (Accel Entertainment, Inc.) are both stocks. MCS operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while ACEL operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, MCS returned 14.17%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for ACEL. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MCS vs. ACEL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCS achieves a 89.38% return, which is significantly higher than ACEL's 5.35% return.
MCS
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 25.43%
- 6M
- 94.65%
- YTD
- 89.38%
- 1Y
- 99.60%
- 3Y*
- 25.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.17%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.34%
ACEL
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 5.35%
- 1Y
- -3.69%
- 3Y*
- 2.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.94M | $3.19M | $3.82M | |
| $8.34M | $5.93M | $5.28M |
MCS vs. ACEL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCS The Marcus Corporation | 89.38% | -26.56% | 50.38% | 2.94% | -18.93% | 32.49% | -57.29% | -5.67% |
ACEL Accel Entertainment, Inc. | 5.35% | 6.84% | 3.99% | 33.38% | -40.86% | 28.91% | -19.20% | 16.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCS and ACEL is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.36 |
The correlation between MCS and ACEL shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MCS:
$899.40M
ACEL:
$978.34M
MCS:
$0.73
ACEL:
$0.60
MCS:
39.64
ACEL:
19.96
MCS:
1.14
ACEL:
0.76
MCS:
1.97
ACEL:
3.71
MCS:
$789.80M
ACEL:
$1.36B
MCS:
$882.62M
ACEL:
$432.42M
MCS:
$105.53M
ACEL:
$178.48M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCS vs. ACEL — Risk / Return Rank
MCS
ACEL
MCS vs. ACEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Marcus Corporation (MCS) and Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCS | ACEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.00 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | -0.29 | +4.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.72 | -0.56 | +12.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCS vs. ACEL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCS drawdown since its inception was -83.85%, which is greater than ACEL's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCS and ACEL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCS | ACEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.85% | -57.83% | -26.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.53% | -23.00% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.87% | -26.02% | -16.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.68% | -47.08% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.67% | -17.39% | -11.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.43% | -23.97% | -4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.45% | 13.35% | -5.90% |
Volatility
MCS vs. ACEL - Volatility Comparison
The Marcus Corporation (MCS) has a higher volatility of 18.77% compared to Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) at 7.17%. This indicates that MCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCS | ACEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.77% | 7.17% | +11.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.27% | 27.34% | +2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.92% | 36.77% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 35.32% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.12% | 43.64% | +1.48% |
Dividends
MCS vs. ACEL - Dividend Comparison
MCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while ACEL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEL Accel Entertainment, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCS The Marcus Corporation | 1.10% | 1.93% | 1.30% | 1.65% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 2.01% | 1.52% | 1.83% | 1.43% | 2.16% |
Financials
MCS vs. ACEL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Marcus Corporation and Accel Entertainment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MCS vs. ACEL - Profitability Comparison
MCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Marcus Corporation reported a gross profit of 95.52M and revenue of 231.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.2%.
ACEL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.94M and revenue of 351.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
MCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Marcus Corporation reported an operating income of 27.07M and revenue of 231.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.
ACEL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.08M and revenue of 351.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.
MCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Marcus Corporation reported a net income of 15.84M and revenue of 231.74M, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
ACEL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported a net income of 14.67M and revenue of 351.56M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MCS and ACEL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCS has higher volatility (18.77%) compared to ACEL (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCS dropped -83.85% vs ACEL's -57.83%.
MCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCS and ACEL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer