PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCS vs. ACEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MCS vs. ACEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Marcus Corporation (MCS) and Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCS achieves a 26.91% return, which is significantly higher than ACEL's 2.89% return.


MCS

1D
-2.26%
1M
14.19%
YTD
26.91%
6M
27.48%
1Y
12.88%
3Y*
9.80%
5Y*
-1.16%
10Y*
1.37%

ACEL

1D
-2.17%
1M
-3.85%
YTD
2.89%
6M
10.86%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
6.72%
5Y*
-1.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCS vs. ACEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MCS
The Marcus Corporation
26.91%-26.56%50.38%2.94%-18.93%32.49%-57.29%-4.51%
ACEL
Accel Entertainment, Inc.
2.89%6.84%3.99%33.38%-40.86%28.91%-19.20%14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MCS and ACEL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2019

0.37

The correlation between MCS and ACEL shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MCS:

$598.28M

ACEL:

$987.26M

EPS

MCS:

$0.46

ACEL:

$0.60

PE Ratio

MCS:

42.74

ACEL:

19.57

PS Ratio

MCS:

0.79

ACEL:

0.74

PB Ratio

MCS:

0.60

ACEL:

3.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

MCS:

$764.10M

ACEL:

$1.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MCS:

$868.52M

ACEL:

$432.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

MCS:

$92.46M

ACEL:

$178.48M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


The Marcus Corporation

Accel Entertainment, Inc.

Return for Risk

MCS vs. ACEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCS
MCS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ACEL
ACEL Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ACEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACEL Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ACEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACEL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCS vs. ACEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Marcus Corporation (MCS) and Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCSACELDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

0.11

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.79

0.42

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.06

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

0.16

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.02

0.30

+0.72

MCS vs. ACEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the ACEL Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCS and ACEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCSACELDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

0.11

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

-0.05

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.02

+0.14

Drawdowns

MCS vs. ACEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCS drawdown since its inception was -83.85%, which is greater than ACEL's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCS and ACEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSACELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.85%

-57.83%

-26.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.44%

-26.02%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.87%

-26.02%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.40%

-47.08%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.20%

-19.31%

-32.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.37%

-24.24%

-4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.69%

13.66%

-0.97%

Volatility

MCS vs. ACEL - Volatility Comparison

The Marcus Corporation (MCS) and Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) have volatilities of 10.74% and 11.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSACELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.74%

11.27%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.48%

26.50%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.12%

36.08%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.82%

35.45%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.65%

43.95%

+0.70%

Dividends

MCS vs. ACEL - Dividend Comparison

MCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while ACEL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACEL
Accel Entertainment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCS
The Marcus Corporation
1.64%1.93%1.30%1.65%0.69%0.00%1.26%2.01%1.52%1.83%1.43%2.16%

Financials

MCS vs. ACEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Marcus Corporation and Accel Entertainment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
154.40M
351.56M
(MCS) Total Revenue
(ACEL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MCS vs. ACEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Marcus Corporation and Accel Entertainment, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
89.3%
31.3%
Portfolio components
MCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Marcus Corporation reported a gross profit of 137.82M and revenue of 154.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.3%.

ACEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.94M and revenue of 351.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

MCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Marcus Corporation reported an operating income of -19.26M and revenue of 154.40M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.5%.

ACEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.08M and revenue of 351.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.

MCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Marcus Corporation reported a net income of -15.35M and revenue of 154.40M, resulting in a net margin of -9.9%.

ACEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported a net income of 14.67M and revenue of 351.56M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MCS and ACEL have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACEL has higher volatility (11.27%) compared to MCS (10.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCS dropped -83.85% vs ACEL's -57.83%.

MCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCS and ACEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer