MCO vs. ASTS
MCO (Moody's Corporation) and ASTS (AST SpaceMobile, Inc.) are both stocks. MCO operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services), while ASTS operates in Communication Equipment (Technology). Over the past 5 years, MCO returned 5.52%/yr vs 50.21%/yr for ASTS. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MCO vs. ASTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCO achieves a -12.04% return, which is significantly lower than ASTS's 0.77% return.
MCO
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- -12.04%
- 6M
- -11.83%
- 1Y
- -4.03%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- 18.07%
ASTS
- 1D
- -9.26%
- 1M
- -30.86%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- -15.37%
- 1Y
- 59.32%
- 3Y*
- 120.25%
- 5Y*
- 50.21%
- 10Y*
- —
MCO vs. ASTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCO Moody's Corporation | -12.04% | 8.74% | 22.17% | 41.52% | -27.80% | 26.85% |
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 0.77% | 244.22% | 249.92% | 25.10% | -39.29% | -31.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCO and ASTS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.22 |
The correlation between MCO and ASTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MCO:
$79.31B
ASTS:
$21.28B
MCO:
$13.92
ASTS:
-$1.84
MCO:
10.18
ASTS:
228.68
MCO:
26.49
ASTS:
8.00
MCO:
$7.87B
ASTS:
$84.94M
MCO:
$5.49B
ASTS:
-$22.93M
MCO:
$3.95B
ASTS:
-$536.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCO vs. ASTS — Risk / Return Rank
MCO
ASTS
MCO vs. ASTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moody's Corporation (MCO) and AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCO | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.17 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.25 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 2.38 | -2.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCO vs. ASTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCO drawdown since its inception was -78.72%, smaller than the maximum ASTS drawdown of -85.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCO and ASTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCO | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.72% | -85.57% | +6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.61% | -47.69% | +24.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.65% | -70.66% | +46.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | -85.57% | +43.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.72% | -45.01% | +28.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.76% | -40.50% | +22.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.20% | 25.02% | -13.82% |
Volatility
MCO vs. ASTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Moody's Corporation (MCO) is 6.89%, while AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) has a volatility of 42.16%. This indicates that MCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCO | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 42.16% | -35.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.33% | 83.93% | -61.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.73% | 106.17% | -79.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 109.65% | -83.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 110.98% | -83.12% |
Dividends
MCO vs. ASTS - Dividend Comparison
MCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while ASTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCO Moody's Corporation | 0.88% | 0.74% | 0.72% | 0.79% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.77% | 0.84% | 1.26% | 1.03% | 1.57% | 1.36% |
Financials
MCO vs. ASTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moody's Corporation and AST SpaceMobile, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MCO and ASTS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASTS has higher volatility (42.16%) compared to MCO (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCO dropped -78.72% vs ASTS's -85.57%.
ASTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCO and ASTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer