PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCI vs. MPV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MCI vs. MPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) and Barings Participation Investors (MPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCI achieves a -1.90% return, which is significantly lower than MPV's 7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MCI has underperformed MPV with an annualized return of 7.99%, while MPV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.65% annualized return.


MCI

1D
-2.03%
1M
1.39%
YTD
-1.90%
6M
-12.08%
1Y
-2.37%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
7.99%

MPV

1D
-1.54%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
7.24%
6M
-11.24%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCI vs. MPV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCI
Barings Corporate Investors
-1.90%-3.74%20.83%44.49%-5.91%29.03%-15.77%23.40%4.35%6.48%
MPV
Barings Participation Investors
7.24%0.74%20.52%39.14%-10.73%31.93%-21.01%14.57%14.84%7.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MCI and MPV is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 1989

0.18

Over the past year, MCI and MPV have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

MCI:

$1.56

MPV:

$2.84

PE Ratio

MCI:

11.15

MPV:

5.88

PEG Ratio

MCI:

0.14

MPV:

0.41

PS Ratio

MCI:

8.68

MPV:

4.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

MCI:

$41.06M

MPV:

$38.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MCI:

$41.06M

MPV:

$38.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

MCI:

$0.00

MPV:

$0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCI vs. MPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCI
MCI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCI Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MPV
MPV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCI vs. MPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) and Barings Participation Investors (MPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCIMPVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.11

0.13

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.01

0.37

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.05

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

0.17

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.21

0.47

-0.68

MCI vs. MPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the MPV Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCI and MPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCIMPVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

0.13

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.61

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.38

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.37

+0.15

Drawdowns

MCI vs. MPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCI drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, which is greater than MPV's maximum drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCI and MPV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCIMPVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-54.02%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.76%

-19.76%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.58%

-19.76%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-22.63%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.64%

-54.02%

+9.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.02%

-13.96%

-9.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-7.75%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.34%

7.20%

+4.14%

Volatility

MCI vs. MPV - Volatility Comparison

Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) and Barings Participation Investors (MPV) have volatilities of 5.84% and 5.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCIMPVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

5.57%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

20.13%

-5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.61%

25.58%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.80%

21.06%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.66%

25.81%

-1.15%

Dividends

MCI vs. MPV - Dividend Comparison

MCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than MPV's 8.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCI
Barings Corporate Investors
9.19%8.82%8.29%7.70%7.31%6.01%7.28%7.12%8.16%7.86%7.75%6.96%
MPV
Barings Participation Investors
8.87%9.31%9.19%8.27%6.98%5.41%6.73%6.70%7.18%7.66%7.61%7.86%

Financials

MCI vs. MPV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barings Corporate Investors and Barings Participation Investors. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00M7.00M8.00M9.00M10.00M11.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
9.16M
8.19M
(MCI) Total Revenue
(MPV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MCI and MPV have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCI has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to MPV (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCI dropped -57.08% vs MPV's -54.02%.

MPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCI and MPV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer