MCI vs. EOS-USD
MCI (Barings Corporate Investors) is a stock, while EOS-USD (EOS) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, MCI returned 11.58%/yr vs -55.77%/yr for EOS-USD. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MCI vs. EOS-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCI achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly higher than EOS-USD's -61.85% return.
MCI
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- -8.37%
- 1Y
- -8.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
EOS-USD
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- -23.16%
- YTD
- -61.85%
- 6M
- -60.55%
- 1Y
- -88.12%
- 3Y*
- -56.15%
- 5Y*
- -55.77%
- 10Y*
- —
MCI vs. EOS-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCI Barings Corporate Investors | -1.62% | -3.74% | 20.83% | 44.49% | -5.91% | 29.03% | -15.77% | 23.40% | 4.35% | 7.93% |
EOS-USD EOS | -61.85% | -79.52% | -8.35% | -1.89% | -71.60% | 16.76% | 0.93% | 0.16% | -70.72% | 2,091.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCI and EOS-USD is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCI vs. EOS-USD — Risk / Return Rank
MCI
EOS-USD
MCI vs. EOS-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) and EOS (EOS-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCI | EOS-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.68 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.99 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | -1.34 | +0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCI vs. EOS-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCI drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, smaller than the maximum EOS-USD drawdown of -99.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCI and EOS-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCI | EOS-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.08% | -99.72% | +42.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.76% | -90.31% | +66.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.58% | -95.59% | +68.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.58% | -99.04% | +71.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.80% | -99.72% | +76.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -84.95% | +75.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.25% | 67.86% | -55.61% |
Volatility
MCI vs. EOS-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) is 6.25%, while EOS (EOS-USD) has a volatility of 30.03%. This indicates that MCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EOS-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCI | EOS-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 30.03% | -23.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.27% | 57.74% | -42.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.91% | 63.84% | -41.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 71.77% | -49.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 109.11% | -84.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCI and EOS-USD have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EOS-USD has higher volatility (30.03%) compared to MCI (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCI dropped -57.08% vs EOS-USD's -99.72%.
MCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.41 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCI and EOS-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer