PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCI vs. BST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MCI vs. BST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCI achieves a -1.90% return, which is significantly lower than BST's 24.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MCI has underperformed BST with an annualized return of 7.99%, while BST has yielded a comparatively higher 20.54% annualized return.


MCI

1D
-2.03%
1M
1.39%
YTD
-1.90%
6M
-12.08%
1Y
-2.37%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
7.99%

BST

1D
-1.50%
1M
14.60%
YTD
24.81%
6M
28.67%
1Y
46.47%
3Y*
23.83%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
20.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCI vs. BST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCI
Barings Corporate Investors
-1.90%-3.74%20.83%44.49%-5.91%29.03%-15.77%23.40%4.35%6.48%
BST
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
24.81%23.65%17.96%30.07%-38.28%-0.35%69.27%34.57%8.84%57.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MCI and BST is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014

0.10

Fundamentals

EPS

MCI:

$1.56

BST:

$15.06

PE Ratio

MCI:

11.15

BST:

3.26

PEG Ratio

MCI:

0.14

BST:

1.75

PS Ratio

MCI:

8.68

BST:

6.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

MCI:

$41.06M

BST:

$278.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MCI:

$41.06M

BST:

$423.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

MCI:

$0.00

BST:

$522.97M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCI vs. BST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCI
MCI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCI Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BST
BST Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BST Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BST Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCI vs. BST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCIBSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.11

2.59

-2.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.01

3.47

-3.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.45

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

3.05

-3.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.21

10.09

-10.30

MCI vs. BST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the BST Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCI and BST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCIBSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

2.59

-2.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.23

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.80

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.66

-0.15

Drawdowns

MCI vs. BST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCI drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, which is greater than BST's maximum drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCI and BST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCIBSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-47.72%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.76%

-15.31%

-8.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.58%

-23.37%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-47.72%

+20.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.64%

-47.72%

+3.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.02%

-1.50%

-21.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-12.98%

+3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.34%

4.62%

+6.72%

Volatility

MCI vs. BST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) is 5.84%, while BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that MCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCIBSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

6.35%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

15.24%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.61%

18.07%

+4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.80%

23.61%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.66%

25.75%

-1.09%

Dividends

MCI vs. BST - Dividend Comparison

MCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than BST's 8.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BST
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
8.56%10.36%8.21%8.91%10.57%5.38%3.85%10.52%6.41%4.80%6.69%6.93%
MCI
Barings Corporate Investors
9.19%8.82%8.29%7.70%7.31%6.01%7.28%7.12%8.16%7.86%7.75%6.96%

Financials

MCI vs. BST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barings Corporate Investors and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
9.16M
157.07M
(MCI) Total Revenue
(BST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MCI and BST have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BST has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to MCI (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCI dropped -57.08% vs BST's -47.72%.

BST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCI and BST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer