MCHI vs. EEMV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV).
MCHI and EEMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MCHI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. EEMV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. Both MCHI and EEMV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MCHI or EEMV.
Performance
MCHI vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a 16.80% return, which is significantly higher than EEMV's 7.44% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHI has underperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 1.60%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively higher 2.46% annualized return.
MCHI
16.80%
-4.67%
0.31%
12.79%
-2.65%
1.60%
EEMV
7.44%
-4.82%
2.82%
12.14%
2.69%
2.46%
Key characteristics
| MCHI | EEMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.28 | 1.27 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.64 | 1.84 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.08 | 1.23 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.14 | 0.91 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.85 | 6.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.22% | 1.83% |
| Daily Std Dev | 31.19% | 9.48% |
| Max Drawdown | -62.84% | -31.56% |
| Current Drawdown | -47.83% | -6.68% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCHI vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between MCHI and EEMV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MCHI vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MCHI vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison
MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than EEMV's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.50% | 3.49% | 2.16% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.37% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.86% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% | 2.71% | 2.51% |
Drawdowns
MCHI vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.84%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and EEMV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MCHI vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a higher volatility of 10.81% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) at 3.11%. This indicates that MCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.