Correlation
The correlation between MCH and KALL is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
MCH vs. KALL
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL).
MCH and KALL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MCH is an actively managed fund by Matthews Asia. It was launched on Jul 13, 2022. KALL is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Feb 13, 2015.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MCH or KALL.
Performance
MCH vs. KALL - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
MCH:
0.42
KALL:
0.46
MCH:
0.80
KALL:
0.79
MCH:
1.11
KALL:
1.12
MCH:
0.37
KALL:
0.26
MCH:
0.79
KALL:
0.84
MCH:
16.79%
KALL:
16.08%
MCH:
36.93%
KALL:
33.90%
MCH:
-40.53%
KALL:
-56.32%
MCH:
-20.09%
KALL:
-39.04%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCH achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly lower than KALL's 8.39% return.
MCH
4.94%
-0.58%
3.05%
15.21%
N/A
N/A
N/A
KALL
8.39%
-0.02%
8.85%
17.43%
1.56%
0.48%
0.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCH vs. KALL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KALL's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MCH vs. KALL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MCH
KALL
MCH vs. KALL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
MCH vs. KALL - Dividend Comparison
MCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than KALL's 2.15% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCH Matthews China Active ETF | 1.25% | 1.32% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KALL KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF | 2.15% | 2.33% | 3.37% | 3.68% | 4.64% | 1.01% | 1.45% | 2.06% | 1.22% | 4.32% | 1.60% |
Drawdowns
MCH vs. KALL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCH drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, smaller than the maximum KALL drawdown of -56.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCH and KALL.
Loading data...
Volatility
MCH vs. KALL - Volatility Comparison
Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) at 5.24%. This indicates that MCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KALL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...