MCFT vs. FCOM

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MCFT (MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while FCOM (Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, MCFT returned 6.86%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for FCOM. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MCFT vs. FCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCFT achieves a 16.18% return, which is significantly higher than FCOM's -2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MCFT has underperformed FCOM with an annualized return of 6.86%, while FCOM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.

MCFT

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: -8.99%
• YTD: 16.18%
• 6M: 21.25%
• 1Y: 25.90%
• 3Y*: -8.85%
• 5Y*: -3.72%
• 10Y*: 6.86%

FCOM

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: -5.03%
• YTD: -2.64%
• 6M: -2.72%
• 1Y: 17.48%
• 3Y*: 22.90%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 11.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCFT vs. FCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCFT MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.	16.18%	-0.84%	-15.77%	-12.49%	-8.68%	14.05%	57.71%	-15.78%	-15.84%	52.40%
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF	-2.64%	26.06%	33.05%	44.65%	-38.97%	13.88%	28.33%	26.69%	-5.33%	8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MCFT and FCOM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2015	0.35

The correlation between MCFT and FCOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MCFT vs. FCOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCFT

MCFT Risk / Return Rank: 60
MCFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
MCFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
MCFT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
MCFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MCFT Martin Ratio Rank: 61

FCOM

FCOM Risk / Return Rank: 32
FCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCFT vs. FCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MCFT	FCOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	1.13	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	1.72	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.20	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	1.30	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.02	4.91	-2.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MCFT vs. FCOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCFT Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the FCOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCFT and FCOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCFT	FCOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	1.13	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	0.34	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	0.56	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.56	-0.44

Drawdowns

MCFT vs. FCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCFT drawdown since its inception was -86.38%, which is greater than FCOM's maximum drawdown of -46.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCFT and FCOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCFT	FCOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.38%	-46.76%	-39.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.69%	-13.48%	-14.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.30%	-21.16%	-32.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.61%	-46.76%	-10.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.38%	-46.76%	-39.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.91%	-5.89%	-36.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.51%	-8.66%	-22.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.87%	3.57%	+9.30%

Volatility

MCFT vs. FCOM - Volatility Comparison

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) has a higher volatility of 15.74% compared to Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) at 4.41%. This indicates that MCFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCFT	FCOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.74%	4.41%	+11.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.08%	11.24%	+16.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.74%	15.50%	+25.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.31%	21.18%	+21.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.58%	20.96%	+28.62%

Dividends

MCFT vs. FCOM - Dividend Comparison

MCFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF	0.95%	0.88%	0.87%	0.77%	1.04%	0.90%	0.68%	0.86%	2.78%	11.70%	2.27%	2.92%
MCFT MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	29.49%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCFT and FCOM in my portfolio?

MCFT and FCOM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCFT or FCOM?

MCFT has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to FCOM (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCFT dropped -86.38% vs FCOM's -46.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.