PortfoliosLab logo
MCDFX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MCDFX and VOO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MCDFX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Dividend Fund (MCDFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
137.15%
574.26%
MCDFX
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MCDFX:

0.74

VOO:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

MCDFX:

1.08

VOO:

0.92

Omega Ratio

MCDFX:

1.15

VOO:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

MCDFX:

0.39

VOO:

0.58

Martin Ratio

MCDFX:

1.49

VOO:

2.25

Ulcer Index

MCDFX:

11.29%

VOO:

4.83%

Daily Std Dev

MCDFX:

26.13%

VOO:

19.11%

Max Drawdown

MCDFX:

-47.71%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

MCDFX:

-26.70%

VOO:

-7.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCDFX achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MCDFX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 3.37%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.


MCDFX

YTD

8.98%

1M

11.72%

6M

2.73%

1Y

19.13%

5Y*

1.68%

10Y*

3.37%

VOO

YTD

-3.28%

1M

13.71%

6M

-4.52%

1Y

10.70%

5Y*

15.89%

10Y*

12.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MCDFX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCDFX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MCDFX vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCDFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCDFX is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCDFX is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCDFX is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCDFX is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCDFX is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCDFX is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MCDFX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Dividend Fund (MCDFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MCDFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCDFX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.74
0.56
MCDFX
VOO

Dividends

MCDFX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MCDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than VOO's 1.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MCDFX
Matthews China Dividend Fund
3.64%3.96%4.07%3.75%2.74%3.91%1.60%2.77%2.77%1.97%2.03%2.68%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.34%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

MCDFX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCDFX drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCDFX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-26.70%
-7.55%
MCDFX
VOO

Volatility

MCDFX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews China Dividend Fund (MCDFX) is 6.09%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that MCDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.09%
11.03%
MCDFX
VOO