PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MC vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MCBAC
YTD Return25.64%18.01%
1Y Return47.77%38.88%
3Y Return (Ann)9.91%1.37%
5Y Return (Ann)23.47%8.08%
10Y Return (Ann)15.59%10.91%
Sharpe Ratio1.501.57
Daily Std Dev32.73%23.75%
Max Drawdown-58.26%-93.45%
Current Drawdown-0.24%-15.09%

Fundamentals


MCBAC
Market Cap$4.81B$303.40B
EPS$0.15$2.88
PE Ratio455.3313.58
PEG Ratio1.971.76
Total Revenue (TTM)$969.13M$97.22B
Gross Profit (TTM)$178.88M$83.30B
EBITDA (TTM)$16.19M$19.72B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between MC and BAC is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MC vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MC achieves a 25.64% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 18.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MC has outperformed BAC with an annualized return of 15.59%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
29.90%
9.57%
MC
BAC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MC vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moelis & Company (MC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MC, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MC, currently valued at 2.10, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MC, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MC, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MC, currently valued at 6.78, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.006.78
BAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.57
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAC, currently valued at 2.34, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAC, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.80
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAC, currently valued at 6.70, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.006.70

MC vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which roughly equals the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MC and BAC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.50
1.57
MC
BAC

Dividends

MC vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than BAC's 2.52% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MC
Moelis & Company
3.51%4.28%6.25%10.88%8.88%10.18%14.19%5.11%9.71%3.43%4.01%0.00%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.52%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%0.26%

Drawdowns

MC vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.24%
-15.09%
MC
BAC

Volatility

MC vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

Moelis & Company (MC) has a higher volatility of 9.53% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 5.49%. This indicates that MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
9.53%
5.49%
MC
BAC

Financials

MC vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moelis & Company and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items