PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MC.PA vs. TMUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

MC.PA vs. TMUS

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS).

Performance

MC.PA vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MC.PA vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne		-26.97%3.93%-11.73%9.60%-4.76%43.83%24.66%63.17%7.31%37.90%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.		1.47%-17.67%48.93%11.57%28.19%-7.56%57.78%26.07%4.86%-3.14%
Different Trading Currencies

MC.PA is traded in EUR, while TMUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TMUS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a -26.97% return, which is significantly lower than TMUS's 2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has underperformed TMUS with an annualized return of 14.18%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively higher 18.09% annualized return.

MC.PA

1D
-0.01%
1M
-6.20%
YTD
-26.97%
6M
-12.49%
1Y
-16.14%
3Y*
-16.06%
5Y*
-2.11%
10Y*
14.18%

TMUS

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.18%
YTD
2.64%
6M
-9.20%
1Y
-26.50%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
18.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

T-Mobile US, Inc.

Often compared with MC.PA:
MC.PA vs. LVMUYMC.PA vs. RMS.PAMC.PA vs. KER.PAMC.PA vs. CDI.PAMC.PA vs. LRLCYMC.PA vs. CLHMC.PA vs. ELF
Often compared with TMUS:
TMUS vs. VZTMUS vs. TTMUS vs. DTE.DETMUS vs. DTEGYTMUS vs. SPOTTMUS vs. VTITMUS vs. GOOGL

Return for Risk

MC.PA vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MC.PA
MC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
TMUS
TMUS Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TMUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMUS Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TMUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMUS Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MC.PA vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MC.PATMUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.49

-0.95

+0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.54

-1.21

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.84

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

-0.76

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.41

-1.32

+0.91

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MC.PA vs. TMUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is higher than the TMUS Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MC.PA and TMUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MC.PATMUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

-0.95

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.47

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.68

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.21

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between MC.PA and TMUS is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MC.PA vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison

MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than TMUS's 1.89% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne		2.76%2.02%2.05%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.		1.89%1.80%1.28%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MC.PA vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, smaller than the maximum TMUS drawdown of -86.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and TMUS.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

MC.PATMUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.25%

-86.29%

+16.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.11%

-30.63%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.03%

-31.99%

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.03%

-31.99%

-17.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.65%

-24.92%

-19.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-25.93%

+9.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.18%

16.85%

-4.67%

Volatility

MC.PA vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) is 6.59%, while T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that MC.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

MC.PATMUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

7.03%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.24%

18.06%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.44%

28.15%

+4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.47%

23.94%

+5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.74%

26.61%

+1.13%

Financials

MC.PA vs. TMUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and T-Mobile US, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Please note, different currencies. MC.PA values in EUR, TMUS values in USD