PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MC.PA vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MC.PAMSFT
YTD Return6.56%5.22%
1Y Return-9.29%30.38%
3Y Return (Ann)8.87%17.17%
5Y Return (Ann)18.20%26.41%
10Y Return (Ann)21.54%27.99%
Sharpe Ratio-0.371.44
Daily Std Dev27.29%21.01%
Max Drawdown-70.25%-69.41%
Current Drawdown-11.96%-8.02%

Fundamentals


MC.PAMSFT
Market Cap€395.74B$3.02T
EPS€30.34$11.54
PE Ratio26.1135.21
PEG Ratio2.582.02
Revenue (TTM)€86.15B$236.58B
Gross Profit (TTM)€54.20B$135.62B
EBITDA (TTM)€25.27B$126.13B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between MC.PA and MSFT is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's 5.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 21.54%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 27.99% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%200,000.00%400,000.00%600,000.00%800,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
22,127.32%
655,946.51%
MC.PA
MSFT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

Microsoft Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MC.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.42, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.45
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.95
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.71, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.71
MSFT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.86
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 5.19, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.19

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MC.PA and MSFT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.42
1.32
MC.PA
MSFT

Dividends

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than MSFT's 0.72% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
1.68%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%3.58%2.26%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.72%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%2.59%

Drawdowns

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, roughly equal to the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-16.11%
-8.02%
MC.PA
MSFT

Volatility

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) have volatilities of 6.84% and 6.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.84%
6.58%
MC.PA
MSFT

Financials

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. MC.PA values in EUR, MSFT values in USD