PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MC.PA vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-26.57%
-1.66%
MC.PA
MSFT

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a -19.00% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's 11.63% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 18.38%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.92% annualized return.


MC.PA

YTD

-19.00%

1M

-5.55%

6M

-24.85%

1Y

-15.84%

5Y (annualized)

9.49%

10Y (annualized)

18.38%

MSFT

YTD

11.63%

1M

-0.16%

6M

-0.46%

1Y

13.50%

5Y (annualized)

23.85%

10Y (annualized)

25.92%

Fundamentals


MC.PAMSFT
Market Cap€285.68B$3.15T
EPS€27.94$12.12
PE Ratio20.4934.90
PEG Ratio5.162.21
Total Revenue (TTM)€85.59B$254.19B
Gross Profit (TTM)€58.65B$176.28B
EBITDA (TTM)€24.43B$139.70B

Key characteristics


MC.PAMSFT
Sharpe Ratio-0.560.59
Sortino Ratio-0.730.88
Omega Ratio0.911.12
Calmar Ratio-0.460.75
Martin Ratio-0.911.80
Ulcer Index17.57%6.44%
Daily Std Dev28.26%19.66%
Max Drawdown-70.25%-69.41%
Current Drawdown-33.08%-10.54%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between MC.PA and MSFT is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.58, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.580.56
The chart of Sortino ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.760.84
The chart of Omega ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.911.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.450.70
The chart of Martin ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.98, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.981.68
MC.PA
MSFT

The current MC.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MC.PA and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.58
0.56
MC.PA
MSFT

Dividends

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than MSFT's 0.54% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.21%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%3.58%2.26%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.54%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%2.59%

Drawdowns

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, roughly equal to the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-36.92%
-10.54%
MC.PA
MSFT

Volatility

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) has a higher volatility of 8.91% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 8.30%. This indicates that MC.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.91%
8.30%
MC.PA
MSFT

Financials

MC.PA vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MC.PA values in EUR, MSFT values in USD