PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MC.PA vs. LSCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MC.PA vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (MC.PA) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MC.PA is traded in EUR, while LSCC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LSCC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a -23.29% return, which is significantly lower than LSCC's 75.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has underperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 15.12%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 34.83% annualized return.


MC.PA

1D
-1.67%
1M
-2.48%
6M
-15.10%
YTD
-23.29%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
-15.68%
5Y*
-4.04%
10Y*
15.12%
ALL TIME*
12.03%

LSCC

1D
0.47%
1M
-17.98%
6M
53.31%
YTD
75.60%
1Y
141.07%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
18.98%
10Y*
34.83%
ALL TIME*
21.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MC.PA vs. LSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE
-23.29%3.93%-11.73%9.60%-4.76%43.83%24.66%63.17%7.31%37.90%
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
75.60%14.47%-12.47%3.15%-10.59%80.76%119.66%182.84%25.34%-31.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MC.PA and LSCC is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2007

0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between MC.PA and LSCC has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MC.PA vs. LSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MC.PA
MC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
MC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

LSCC
LSCC Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MC.PA vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (MC.PA) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MC.PALSCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.38

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

7.12

-6.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.32

20.09

-19.77

MC.PA vs. LSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the LSCC Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MC.PA and LSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MC.PA vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, smaller than the maximum LSCC drawdown of -71.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and LSCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MC.PALSCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.74%

-71.38%

+16.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.65%

-19.94%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.14%

-61.64%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.03%

-61.64%

+12.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.03%

-61.64%

+12.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.86%

-19.06%

-22.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-23.16%

+10.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.11%

7.05%

+10.06%

Volatility

MC.PA vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (MC.PA) is 7.95%, while Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a volatility of 20.17%. This indicates that MC.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MC.PALSCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

20.17%

-12.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.75%

44.87%

-23.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.66%

57.05%

-26.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.99%

54.22%

-24.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.87%

50.66%

-22.79%

Dividends

MC.PA vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison

MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while LSCC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE
2.67%2.02%2.05%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%

Financials

MC.PA vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MC.PA values in EUR, LSCC values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


MC.PA and LSCC have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MC.PA and LSCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer