MBUU vs. TDCX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) and TDCX Inc. (TDCX).

Performance

MBUU vs. TDCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) and TDCX Inc. (TDCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MBUU vs. TDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MBUU Malibu Boats, Inc.	-8.12%	-24.95%	-31.43%	2.85%	-22.45%	-5.40%
TDCX TDCX Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	47.01%	-60.82%	-35.35%	0.42%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) MBUU : $819.06M TDCX : $658.35M
Gross Profit (TTM) MBUU : $131.52M TDCX : $233.78M
EBITDA (TTM) MBUU : $50.91M TDCX : $198.79M

Returns By Period

MBUU

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -10.81%
• YTD: -8.12%
• 6M: -20.12%
• 1Y: -15.51%
• 3Y*: -22.85%
• 5Y*: -20.46%
• 10Y*: 4.86%

TDCX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MBUU vs. TDCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBUU

MBUU Risk / Return Rank: 30
MBUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
MBUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MBUU Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MBUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
MBUU Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBUU vs. TDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) and TDCX Inc. (TDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MBUU	TDCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.30	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBUU	TDCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between MBUU and TDCX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MBUU vs. TDCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MBUU nor TDCX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MBUU	TDCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.81%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MBUU	TDCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.33%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.06%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.98%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.72%	—	—

Financials