PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBOX vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBOX vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBOX achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 3.51% return.


MBOX

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.07%
YTD
15.47%
6M
14.89%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*

NOBL

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.01%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBOX vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
15.47%8.72%16.39%15.84%-4.32%9.48%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.51%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MBOX and NOBL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021

0.85

The correlation between MBOX and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MBOX vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MBOX
NOBL

Financial Services

25.0%
12.4%

Technology

18.3%
3.6%

Energy

14.1%
3.4%

Healthcare

13.4%
9.7%

Industrials

8.2%
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
23.5%

Basic Materials

3.8%
10.9%

Real Estate

3.4%
4.6%

Utilities

2.2%
6.4%

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
5.1%

Financial Services

MBOX
25.0%
NOBL
12.4%

Technology

MBOX
18.3%
NOBL
3.6%

Energy

MBOX
14.1%
NOBL
3.4%

Healthcare

MBOX
13.4%
NOBL
9.7%

Industrials

MBOX
8.2%
NOBL
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

MBOX
8.0%
NOBL
23.5%

Basic Materials

MBOX
3.8%
NOBL
10.9%

Real Estate

MBOX
3.4%
NOBL
4.6%

Utilities

MBOX
2.2%
NOBL
6.4%

Communication Services

MBOX
2.0%
NOBL

-

Consumer Cyclical

MBOX
1.7%
NOBL
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBOX vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBOX
MBOX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBOX vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBOXNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.14

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

0.99

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.88

2.58

+11.30

MBOX vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBOX and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBOXNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

0.80

+1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.35

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.64

+0.19

Drawdowns

MBOX vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBOX drawdown since its inception was -16.42%, smaller than the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBOX and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBOXNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-35.43%

+19.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-9.11%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

-15.36%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.42%

-17.92%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-5.99%

+5.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-3.48%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

3.50%

-1.77%

Volatility

MBOX vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.36%. This indicates that MBOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBOXNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.36%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

8.00%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.76%

11.33%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

14.38%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

16.60%

-2.13%

MBOX vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBOX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBOX vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

MBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than NOBL's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
1.89%1.94%1.60%2.13%2.87%1.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.12%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBOX and NOBL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBOX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBOX dropped -16.42% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 5-year performance, MBOX leads with 11.86% vs 5.03% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MBOX has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 5.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MBOX.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.89% for MBOX.

They also come from different issuers: EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MBOX and 0.35% for NOBL.

MBOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBOX and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer