MBLY vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MBLY or ET.
Key characteristics
| MBLY | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -60.04% | 34.32% |
| 1Y Return | -56.88% | 39.27% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.82 | 2.57 |
| Sortino Ratio | -1.13 | 3.66 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.86 | 1.46 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.71 | 1.75 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.17 | 21.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 46.72% | 1.91% |
| Daily Std Dev | 66.96% | 15.79% |
| Max Drawdown | -77.52% | -87.81% |
| Current Drawdown | -63.19% | -1.16% |
Fundamentals
| MBLY | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.73B | $58.38B |
| EPS | -$3.66 | $1.36 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.80B | $83.66B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $844.00M | $14.03B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -$2.69B | $12.39B |
Correlation
The correlation between MBLY and ET is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MBLY vs. ET - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MBLY achieves a -60.04% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 34.32% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MBLY vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MBLY vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
MBLY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBLY Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.46% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
MBLY vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBLY drawdown since its inception was -77.52%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBLY and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MBLY vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) has a higher volatility of 21.51% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.25%. This indicates that MBLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MBLY vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities