PortfoliosLab logo
MBLY vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MBLY and ET is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MBLY vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MBLY:

-0.49

ET:

0.77

Sortino Ratio

MBLY:

-0.39

ET:

1.21

Omega Ratio

MBLY:

0.95

ET:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

MBLY:

-0.50

ET:

0.88

Martin Ratio

MBLY:

-0.79

ET:

2.70

Ulcer Index

MBLY:

49.15%

ET:

7.97%

Daily Std Dev

MBLY:

75.47%

ET:

27.54%

Max Drawdown

MBLY:

-77.52%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

MBLY:

-65.44%

ET:

-14.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MBLY:

$13.19B

ET:

$60.67B

EPS

MBLY:

-$3.68

ET:

$1.31

PEG Ratio

MBLY:

1.00

ET:

0.82

PS Ratio

MBLY:

7.12

ET:

0.74

PB Ratio

MBLY:

1.09

ET:

1.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

MBLY:

$1.85B

ET:

$82.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MBLY:

$894.00M

ET:

$15.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

MBLY:

-$2.69B

ET:

$15.57B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBLY achieves a -18.42% return, which is significantly lower than ET's -7.58% return.


MBLY

YTD

-18.42%

1M

12.85%

6M

-9.97%

1Y

-36.67%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ET

YTD

-7.58%

1M

7.78%

6M

-8.84%

1Y

20.09%

3Y*

24.55%

5Y*

26.96%

10Y*

1.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Energy Transfer LP

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MBLY vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBLY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MBLY is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MBLY is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MBLY is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MBLY is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MBLY is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MBLY is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MBLY vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MBLY Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBLY and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MBLY vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

MBLY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MBLY
Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.41%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

MBLY vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBLY drawdown since its inception was -77.52%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBLY and ET.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MBLY vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 9.56%. This indicates that MBLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MBLY vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
438.00M
21.02B
(MBLY) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MBLY vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
47.3%
19.4%
(MBLY) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
MBLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock reported a gross profit of 207.00M and revenue of 438.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.3%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

MBLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock reported an operating income of -117.00M and revenue of 438.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -26.7%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

MBLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock reported a net income of -102.00M and revenue of 438.00M, resulting in a net margin of -23.3%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.