MBLY vs. ET

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MBLY (Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. MBLY operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 3 years, MBLY returned -37.29%/yr vs 24.39%/yr for ET. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MBLY vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBLY achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 22.86% return.

MBLY

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 24.16%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: -10.20%
• 1Y: -35.57%
• 3Y*: -37.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ET

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 22.86%
• 6M: 21.25%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: 24.39%
• 5Y*: 21.90%
• 10Y*: 12.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBLY vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MBLY Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock	2.87%	-47.59%	-54.02%	23.56%	21.02%
ET Energy Transfer LP	22.86%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	-1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MBLY and ET is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022	0.18

The correlation between MBLY and ET shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MBLY : $8.77B ET : $67.59B
EPS MBLY : -$5.07 ET : $1.36
PS Ratio MBLY : 4.32 ET : 0.78
PB Ratio MBLY : 1.07 ET : 1.36
Total Revenue (TTM) MBLY : $2.01B ET : $89.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) MBLY : $972.00M ET : $20.48B
EBITDA (TTM) MBLY : -$3.79B ET : $13.02B

Return for Risk

MBLY vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBLY

MBLY Risk / Return Rank: 17
MBLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
MBLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
MBLY Omega Ratio Rank: 15
MBLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
MBLY Martin Ratio Rank: 23

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 69
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBLY vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MBLY	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	1.09	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.89	1.69	-2.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.19	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	1.77	-2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.88	3.90	-4.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MBLY vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBLY Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBLY and ET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBLY	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.70	1.09	-1.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	0.36	-0.76

Drawdowns

MBLY vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBLY drawdown since its inception was -86.05%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBLY and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBLY	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.05%	-87.81%	+1.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.62%	-10.02%	-55.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-85.21%	-24.56%	-60.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.82%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.16%	-4.12%	-73.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.11%	-25.75%	-21.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.58%	4.55%	+36.03%

Volatility

MBLY vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) has a higher volatility of 17.67% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.97%. This indicates that MBLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBLY	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.67%	5.97%	+11.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.75%	11.89%	+25.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.29%	16.42%	+34.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.26%	24.90%	+35.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.26%	35.04%	+25.22%

Dividends

MBLY vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

MBLY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.83%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%
MBLY Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBLY and ET in my portfolio?

MBLY and ET have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MBLY or ET?

MBLY has higher volatility (17.67%) compared to ET (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBLY dropped -86.05% vs ET's -87.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.