MBIN vs. HESM
MBIN (Merchants Bancorp) and HESM (Hess Midstream LP) are both stocks. MBIN operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while HESM operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 5 years, MBIN returned 11.77%/yr vs 17.07%/yr for HESM. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MBIN vs. HESM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBIN achieves a 38.09% return, which is significantly higher than HESM's 15.44% return.
MBIN
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 38.09%
- 6M
- 42.87%
- 1Y
- 50.12%
- 3Y*
- 25.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- —
HESM
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 15.44%
- 6M
- 20.00%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 17.07%
- 10Y*
- —
MBIN vs. HESM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBIN Merchants Bancorp | 38.09% | -5.51% | -13.59% | 77.01% | -22.06% | 72.80% | 42.55% | 0.30% | 2.43% | 17.43% |
HESM Hess Midstream LP | 15.44% | 0.56% | 26.41% | 14.36% | 16.62% | 52.91% | -5.29% | 43.83% | -8.61% | -1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBIN and HESM is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2017 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MBIN and HESM has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MBIN:
$2.16B
HESM:
$4.93B
MBIN:
$4.97
HESM:
$2.89
MBIN:
9.44
HESM:
13.22
MBIN:
1.63
HESM:
2.99
MBIN:
0.93
HESM:
13.16
MBIN:
$1.32B
HESM:
$1.63B
MBIN:
$423.13M
HESM:
$1.13B
MBIN:
$188.84M
HESM:
$1.24B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBIN vs. HESM — Risk / Return Rank
MBIN
HESM
MBIN vs. HESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) and Hess Midstream LP (HESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MBIN | HESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 0.43 | +0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 0.72 | +1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.10 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 0.47 | +2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.71 | 0.96 | +4.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBIN | HESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.43 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.63 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.33 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
MBIN vs. HESM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBIN drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, smaller than the maximum HESM drawdown of -75.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBIN and HESM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBIN | HESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.77% | -75.16% | +21.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.94% | -25.78% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.94% | -25.78% | -18.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.94% | -28.72% | -15.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.11% | -6.24% | -2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.93% | -11.79% | -8.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 12.64% | -4.20% |
Volatility
MBIN vs. HESM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) is 6.16%, while Hess Midstream LP (HESM) has a volatility of 8.98%. This indicates that MBIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HESM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBIN | HESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 8.98% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.09% | 14.99% | +12.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.50% | 24.24% | +12.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.95% | 27.36% | +8.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.23% | 38.86% | +1.37% |
Dividends
MBIN vs. HESM - Dividend Comparison
MBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than HESM's 7.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HESM Hess Midstream LP | 7.95% | 8.41% | 7.12% | 7.50% | 7.30% | 6.93% | 8.86% | 6.89% | 8.00% | 2.93% |
MBIN Merchants Bancorp | 0.87% | 1.17% | 0.99% | 0.75% | 1.15% | 0.76% | 1.16% | 1.42% | 1.20% | 0.25% |
Financials
MBIN vs. HESM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Merchants Bancorp and Hess Midstream LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MBIN vs. HESM - Profitability Comparison
MBIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merchants Bancorp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 270.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HESM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hess Midstream LP reported a gross profit of 246.00M and revenue of 390.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.1%.
MBIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merchants Bancorp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 270.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
HESM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hess Midstream LP reported an operating income of 238.10M and revenue of 390.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.
MBIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merchants Bancorp reported a net income of 67.73M and revenue of 270.51M, resulting in a net margin of 25.0%.
HESM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hess Midstream LP reported a net income of 87.60M and revenue of 390.10M, resulting in a net margin of 22.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MBIN and HESM have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HESM has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to MBIN (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBIN dropped -53.77% vs HESM's -75.16%.
MBIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBIN and HESM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer