MBC vs. USDT-USD
MBC (MasterBrand Inc.) is a stock, while USDT-USD (Tether) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 3 years, MBC returned -13.64%/yr vs -0.01%/yr for USDT-USD. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MBC vs. USDT-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBC achieves a -25.27% return, which is significantly lower than USDT-USD's 0.03% return.
MBC
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -16.50%
- 6M
- -31.93%
- YTD
- -25.27%
- 1Y
- -25.34%
- 3Y*
- -13.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.13%
USDT-USD
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- -0.09%
- 3Y*
- -0.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.30M | $16.60M | $28.45M | |
USDT-USD Tether | $50.37B | $51.96B | $70.75B |
MBC vs. USDT-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBC MasterBrand Inc. | -25.27% | -24.44% | -1.62% | 96.69% | -8.04% |
USDT-USD Tether | 0.03% | 0.07% | -0.18% | 0.03% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBC and USDT-USD is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBC vs. USDT-USD — Risk / Return Rank
MBC
USDT-USD
MBC vs. USDT-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MasterBrand Inc. (MBC) and Tether (USDT-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBC | USDT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.97 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | -0.23 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | -0.43 | -0.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBC vs. USDT-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBC drawdown since its inception was -64.69%, which is greater than USDT-USD's maximum drawdown of -10.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBC and USDT-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBC | USDT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.69% | -10.32% | -54.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.94% | -0.39% | -50.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.69% | -0.42% | -64.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.03% | -7.33% | -49.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.87% | -6.94% | -15.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.73% | 0.11% | +26.62% |
Volatility
MBC vs. USDT-USD - Volatility Comparison
MasterBrand Inc. (MBC) has a higher volatility of 14.08% compared to Tether (USDT-USD) at 0.13%. This indicates that MBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDT-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBC | USDT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.08% | 0.13% | +13.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.06% | 0.33% | +40.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.33% | 0.41% | +51.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 0.55% | +45.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 6.72% | +39.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBC and USDT-USD have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MBC has higher volatility (14.08%) compared to USDT-USD (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBC dropped -64.69% vs USDT-USD's -10.32%.
USDT-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBC and USDT-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer