MAXN vs. MARK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) and Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK).

Performance

MAXN vs. MARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) and Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAXN vs. MARK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MAXN Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.	-59.27%	-63.53%	-98.95%	-55.35%	15.54%	-51.00%	-24.59%
MARK Remark Holdings, Inc.	-68.57%	-95.98%	-82.43%	-54.98%	-88.91%	-47.82%	71.17%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) MAXN : $176.41M MARK : $4.63M
Gross Profit (TTM) MAXN : -$242.06M MARK : $1.15M
EBITDA (TTM) MAXN : -$504.08M MARK : -$33.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAXN achieves a -59.27% return, which is significantly higher than MARK's -68.57% return.

MAXN

• 1D: -25.83%
• 1M: -54.84%
• YTD: -59.27%
• 6M: -68.72%
• 1Y: -62.91%
• 3Y*: -92.50%
• 5Y*: -79.63%
• 10Y*: —

MARK

• 1D: -26.67%
• 1M: 10.00%
• YTD: -68.57%
• 6M: -78.43%
• 1Y: -97.60%
• 3Y*: -90.71%
• 5Y*: -86.43%
• 10Y*: -65.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MAXN vs. MARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAXN

MAXN Risk / Return Rank: 11
MAXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
MAXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
MAXN Omega Ratio Rank: 15
MAXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
MAXN Martin Ratio Rank: 2

MARK

MARK Risk / Return Rank: 50
MARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
MARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MARK Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MARK Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAXN vs. MARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) and Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAXN	MARK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	-0.12	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.81	5.37	-6.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.87	-0.96
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	-0.99	+0.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.93	-1.24	-0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAXN vs. MARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAXN Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the MARK Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAXN and MARK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAXN	MARK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.66	-0.12	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.67	-0.22	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.64	-0.23	-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between MAXN and MARK is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MAXN vs. MARK - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAXN nor MARK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MAXN vs. MARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAXN drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum MARK drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXN and MARK.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAXN	MARK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-100.00%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.86%	-98.49%	+21.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.97%	-100.00%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-100.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.98%	-100.00%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-77.04%	-95.04%	+18.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.13%	78.96%	-46.83%

Volatility

MAXN vs. MARK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) is 40.17%, while Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) has a volatility of 171.89%. This indicates that MAXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAXN	MARK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	40.17%	171.89%	-131.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	65.73%	321.03%	-255.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	94.95%	790.80%	-695.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	118.63%	394.92%	-276.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	119.44%	290.79%	-171.35%

Financials