MAXN vs. MARK
MAXN (Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.) and MARK (Remark Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MAXN in Solar, MARK in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past 5 years, MAXN returned -78.52%/yr vs -84.54%/yr for MARK. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAXN vs. MARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAXN achieves a -72.39% return, which is significantly lower than MARK's -57.14% return.
MAXN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -72.39%
- 6M
- -73.64%
- 1Y
- -75.66%
- 3Y*
- -93.57%
- 5Y*
- -78.52%
- 10Y*
- —
MARK
- 1D
- -25.00%
- 1M
- 7.14%
- YTD
- -57.14%
- 6M
- -70.00%
- 1Y
- -97.44%
- 3Y*
- -89.64%
- 5Y*
- -84.54%
- 10Y*
- -64.43%
MAXN vs. MARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAXN Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. | -72.39% | -63.53% | -98.95% | -55.35% | 15.54% | -51.00% | -24.59% |
MARK Remark Holdings, Inc. | -57.14% | -95.98% | -82.43% | -54.98% | -88.91% | -47.82% | 71.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAXN and MARK is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2020 | 0.16 |
The correlation between MAXN and MARK shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MAXN:
$176.41M
MARK:
$4.63M
MAXN:
-$242.06M
MARK:
$1.15M
MAXN:
-$504.08M
MARK:
-$33.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAXN vs. MARK — Risk / Return Rank
MAXN
MARK
MAXN vs. MARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) and Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAXN | MARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.70 | -0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.99 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | -1.12 | -0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAXN | MARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | -0.13 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 | -0.23 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | -0.24 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
MAXN vs. MARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAXN drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum MARK drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXN and MARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAXN | MARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -100.00% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.87% | -98.21% | +12.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.98% | -99.92% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.98% | -100.00% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -100.00% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.72% | -95.09% | +17.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.60% | 87.46% | -42.86% |
Volatility
MAXN vs. MARK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) is 0.00%, while Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) has a volatility of 80.17%. This indicates that MAXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAXN | MARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 80.17% | -80.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 107.68% | 358.73% | -251.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 122.40% | 722.60% | -600.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 124.44% | 367.92% | -243.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.64% | 272.77% | -149.13% |
Dividends
MAXN vs. MARK - Dividend Comparison
Neither MAXN nor MARK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MAXN vs. MARK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. and Remark Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MAXN and MARK have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MARK has higher volatility (80.17%) compared to MAXN (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAXN dropped -99.99% vs MARK's -100.00%.
MARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAXN and MARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer