PortfoliosLab logo
MATW vs. LQDT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MATW and LQDT is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MATW vs. LQDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews International Corporation (MATW) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-27.65%
107.57%
MATW
LQDT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MATW:

-0.58

LQDT:

0.76

Sortino Ratio

MATW:

-0.69

LQDT:

1.65

Omega Ratio

MATW:

0.92

LQDT:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

MATW:

-0.38

LQDT:

0.56

Martin Ratio

MATW:

-1.40

LQDT:

4.21

Ulcer Index

MATW:

19.30%

LQDT:

9.49%

Daily Std Dev

MATW:

47.37%

LQDT:

48.08%

Max Drawdown

MATW:

-75.27%

LQDT:

-95.31%

Current Drawdown

MATW:

-67.59%

LQDT:

-60.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MATW:

$587.61M

LQDT:

$995.43M

EPS

MATW:

-$2.55

LQDT:

$0.75

PEG Ratio

MATW:

1.92

LQDT:

1.78

PS Ratio

MATW:

0.34

LQDT:

2.40

PB Ratio

MATW:

1.51

LQDT:

5.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

MATW:

$1.70B

LQDT:

$322.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MATW:

$518.98M

LQDT:

$148.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

MATW:

$55.92M

LQDT:

$31.59M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATW achieves a -25.56% return, which is significantly lower than LQDT's -21.00% return. Over the past 10 years, MATW has underperformed LQDT with an annualized return of -6.30%, while LQDT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.32% annualized return.


MATW

YTD

-25.56%

1M

-1.50%

6M

-15.34%

1Y

-27.20%

5Y*

0.42%

10Y*

-6.30%

LQDT

YTD

-21.00%

1M

-16.42%

6M

3.61%

1Y

36.20%

5Y*

39.84%

10Y*

9.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MATW vs. LQDT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MATW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MATW is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MATW is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MATW is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MATW is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MATW is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MATW is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDT is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDT is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDT is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDT is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDT is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDT is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MATW vs. LQDT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews International Corporation (MATW) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MATW Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the LQDT Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MATW and LQDT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.58
0.76
MATW
LQDT

Dividends

MATW vs. LQDT - Dividend Comparison

MATW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while LQDT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MATW
Matthews International Corporation
3.63%3.50%2.54%2.92%2.36%2.87%2.12%1.90%1.33%0.81%1.01%0.95%
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MATW vs. LQDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATW drawdown since its inception was -75.27%, smaller than the maximum LQDT drawdown of -95.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATW and LQDT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-67.59%
-60.91%
MATW
LQDT

Volatility

MATW vs. LQDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews International Corporation (MATW) is 12.44%, while Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) has a volatility of 16.21%. This indicates that MATW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.44%
16.21%
MATW
LQDT

Financials

MATW vs. LQDT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Matthews International Corporation and Liquidity Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20212022202320242025
427.63M
122.33M
(MATW) Total Revenue
(LQDT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MATW vs. LQDT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Matthews International Corporation and Liquidity Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
33.7%
41.0%
(MATW) Gross Margin
(LQDT) Gross Margin
MATW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matthews International Corporation reported a gross profit of 144.11M and revenue of 427.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

LQDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 50.17M and revenue of 122.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.

MATW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matthews International Corporation reported an operating income of 5.95M and revenue of 427.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.4%.

LQDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.09M and revenue of 122.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

MATW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matthews International Corporation reported a net income of -8.92M and revenue of 427.63M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.

LQDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 5.81M and revenue of 122.33M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.