MATW vs. LQDT
MATW (Matthews International Corporation) and LQDT (Liquidity Services, Inc.) are both stocks. MATW operates in Conglomerates (Industrials), while LQDT operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, MATW returned -4.38%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for LQDT. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MATW vs. LQDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MATW achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than LQDT's 23.79% return. Over the past 10 years, MATW has underperformed LQDT with an annualized return of -4.38%, while LQDT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.71% annualized return.
MATW
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- -9.69%
- 5Y*
- -2.96%
- 10Y*
- -4.38%
LQDT
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 8.97%
- YTD
- 23.79%
- 6M
- 21.66%
- 1Y
- 60.96%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 17.71%
MATW vs. LQDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MATW Matthews International Corporation | 1.87% | -1.50% | -21.25% | 23.36% | -14.50% | 27.72% | -20.49% | -3.95% | -21.88% | -30.53% |
LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 23.79% | -6.13% | 87.62% | 22.40% | -36.32% | 38.78% | 166.95% | -3.40% | 27.22% | -50.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATW and LQDT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2006 | 0.32 |
The correlation between MATW and LQDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (10 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MATW:
$0.41
LQDT:
$0.93
MATW:
63.04
LQDT:
40.14
MATW:
0.51
LQDT:
2.53
MATW:
$1.21B
LQDT:
$479.92M
MATW:
$432.86M
LQDT:
$111.22M
MATW:
$201.65M
LQDT:
$52.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATW vs. LQDT — Risk / Return Rank
MATW
LQDT
MATW vs. LQDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews International Corporation (MATW) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MATW | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.31 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.85 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 8.27 | -4.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MATW vs. LQDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATW drawdown since its inception was -75.27%, smaller than the maximum LQDT drawdown of -95.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATW and LQDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATW | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.27% | -95.31% | +20.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.87% | -21.53% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.68% | -41.08% | -17.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.68% | -57.57% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.27% | -72.78% | -2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.94% | -42.51% | -13.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -62.17% | +37.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.88% | 7.39% | -0.51% |
Volatility
MATW vs. LQDT - Volatility Comparison
Matthews International Corporation (MATW) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) at 7.97%. This indicates that MATW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATW | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.62% | 7.97% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.67% | 20.75% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.95% | 34.94% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.34% | 44.94% | -8.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.97% | 53.11% | -16.14% |
Dividends
MATW vs. LQDT - Dividend Comparison
MATW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, while LQDT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MATW Matthews International Corporation | 3.89% | 3.85% | 4.37% | 2.54% | 2.92% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 2.12% | 1.90% | 1.33% | 0.81% | 1.01% |
Financials
MATW vs. LQDT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Matthews International Corporation and Liquidity Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MATW vs. LQDT - Profitability Comparison
MATW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported a gross profit of 101.98M and revenue of 258.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
LQDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of -54.45M and revenue of 120.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -45.1%.
MATW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported an operating income of -3.18M and revenue of 258.62M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.
LQDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.62M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
MATW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported a net income of -21.83M and revenue of 258.62M, resulting in a net margin of -8.4%.
LQDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 7.52M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MATW and LQDT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MATW has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to LQDT (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MATW dropped -75.27% vs LQDT's -95.31%.
LQDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MATW and LQDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer