MAT vs. W

In the year-to-date period, MAT achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly lower than W's 9.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MAT has underperformed W with an annualized return of -2.07%, while W has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Wayfair Inc. (W). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the W Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAT and W, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither MAT nor W has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum MAT drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, smaller than the maximum W drawdown of -91.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAT and W. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) is 4.97%, while Wayfair Inc. (W) has a volatility of 14.01%. This indicates that MAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than W based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mattel, Inc. and Wayfair Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.