PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAT vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAT vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAT achieves a -27.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MAT has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of -7.01%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


MAT

1D
-0.21%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
-27.72%
6M
-32.45%
1Y
-23.48%
3Y*
-7.43%
5Y*
-7.06%
10Y*
-7.01%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAT vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
-27.72%11.90%-6.09%5.83%-17.25%23.55%28.78%35.64%-35.05%-41.86%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MAT and SCHD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.47

The correlation between MAT and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAT vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAT
MAT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAT vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MATSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.57

2.49

-3.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.50

3.87

-4.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.45

-0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

5.91

-6.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.24

14.53

-15.77

MAT vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAT and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MATSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

2.49

-3.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.58

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.17

0.77

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.86

-0.73

Drawdowns

MAT vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAT drawdown since its inception was -83.68%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAT and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MATSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.68%

-33.37%

-50.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.10%

-4.61%

-31.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.56%

-16.13%

-20.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.50%

-16.85%

-30.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.44%

-33.37%

-44.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.60%

-1.40%

-62.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.35%

-3.32%

-38.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.98%

1.88%

+17.10%

Volatility

MAT vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Mattel, Inc. (MAT) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that MAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MATSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

2.66%

+4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.68%

7.66%

+27.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.00%

10.96%

+30.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.10%

14.38%

+22.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.85%

16.72%

+25.13%

Dividends

MAT vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.92%5.52%5.59%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAT and SCHD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAT has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAT dropped -83.68% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAT and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer