MAT vs. RMS.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MAT or RMS.PA.
Correlation
The correlation between MAT and RMS.PA is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MAT vs. RMS.PA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MAT:
-0.15
RMS.PA:
0.83
MAT:
-0.00
RMS.PA:
1.38
MAT:
1.00
RMS.PA:
1.17
MAT:
-0.08
RMS.PA:
1.02
MAT:
-0.56
RMS.PA:
2.07
MAT:
8.72%
RMS.PA:
10.30%
MAT:
31.83%
RMS.PA:
25.69%
MAT:
-81.65%
RMS.PA:
-47.65%
MAT:
-54.66%
RMS.PA:
-3.99%
Fundamentals
MAT:
$6.36B
RMS.PA:
€241.97B
MAT:
$1.57
RMS.PA:
€42.43
MAT:
1.28
RMS.PA:
5.35
MAT:
$5.35B
RMS.PA:
€14.23B
MAT:
$2.66B
RMS.PA:
€9.86B
MAT:
$882.78M
RMS.PA:
€6.51B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAT achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly lower than RMS.PA's 20.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MAT has underperformed RMS.PA with an annualized return of -3.74%, while RMS.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 23.38% annualized return.
MAT
-5.40%
-2.67%
0.22%
-6.25%
5.92%
-3.74%
RMS.PA
20.81%
16.36%
6.62%
16.36%
28.16%
23.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MAT vs. RMS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MAT vs. RMS.PA - Dividend Comparison
MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMS.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAT Mattel, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 5.52% | 5.59% | 4.91% | 3.03% |
RMS.PA Hermès International Société en commandite par actions | 0.59% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.34% | 0.84% | 0.86% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
MAT vs. RMS.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAT drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than RMS.PA's maximum drawdown of -47.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAT and RMS.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MAT vs. RMS.PA - Volatility Comparison
Mattel, Inc. (MAT) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) at 6.59%. This indicates that MAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MAT vs. RMS.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mattel, Inc. and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities