MAT vs. HTGC
Compare and contrast key facts about Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC).
Performance
MAT vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAT vs. HTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAT Mattel, Inc. | -26.76% | 11.90% | -6.09% | 5.83% | -17.25% | 23.55% | 28.78% | 35.64% | -35.05% | -41.86% |
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc. | -18.99% | 3.54% | 33.33% | 42.91% | -10.42% | 26.50% | 14.49% | 39.86% | -6.86% | 1.86% |
Fundamentals
MAT:
$4.44B
HTGC:
$2.79B
MAT:
$1.25
HTGC:
$0.00
MAT:
0.86
HTGC:
6.25
MAT:
1.72
HTGC:
1.26
MAT:
$5.35B
HTGC:
$451.96M
MAT:
$2.61B
HTGC:
$388.62M
MAT:
$740.16M
HTGC:
$245.95M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAT achieves a -26.76% return, which is significantly lower than HTGC's -18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MAT has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of -7.52%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.
MAT
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- -14.28%
- YTD
- -26.76%
- 6M
- -13.67%
- 1Y
- -25.22%
- 3Y*
- -7.59%
- 5Y*
- -6.40%
- 10Y*
- -7.52%
HTGC
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -18.99%
- 6M
- -17.22%
- 1Y
- -14.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAT vs. HTGC — Risk / Return Rank
MAT
HTGC
MAT vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAT | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | -0.56 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | -0.62 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.92 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.58 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | -1.54 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAT | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | -0.56 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.36 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 | 0.47 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.35 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between MAT and HTGC is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MAT vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison
MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.73%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAT Mattel, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 5.52% | 5.59% |
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc. | 12.73% | 9.99% | 9.56% | 11.40% | 13.77% | 9.76% | 9.02% | 9.49% | 11.40% | 9.45% | 8.79% | 10.17% |
Drawdowns
MAT vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAT drawdown since its inception was -83.68%, which is greater than HTGC's maximum drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAT and HTGC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAT | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.68% | -68.21% | -15.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.10% | -24.74% | -11.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.50% | -36.11% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.44% | -57.54% | -19.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.12% | -23.41% | -39.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.27% | -10.79% | -30.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.79% | 9.38% | +5.41% |
Volatility
MAT vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) is 7.57%, while Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that MAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAT | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.57% | 8.67% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.04% | 19.68% | +17.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.06% | 25.56% | +22.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.23% | 25.66% | +11.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.87% | 27.76% | +14.11% |
Financials
MAT vs. HTGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mattel, Inc. and Hercules Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities