PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MAT vs. HTGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MATHTGC
YTD Return1.59%16.21%
1Y Return14.44%63.98%
3Y Return (Ann)-3.06%16.08%
5Y Return (Ann)9.60%20.59%
10Y Return (Ann)-4.89%14.26%
Sharpe Ratio0.433.08
Daily Std Dev26.67%20.78%
Max Drawdown-81.65%-68.29%
Current Drawdown-51.31%0.00%

Fundamentals


MATHTGC
Market Cap$6.21B$2.92B
EPS$0.60$2.31
PE Ratio30.087.99
PEG Ratio1.160.52
Revenue (TTM)$5.44B$460.67M
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.49B$321.69M
EBITDA (TTM)$818.15M$381.69M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between MAT and HTGC is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MAT vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MAT achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than HTGC's 16.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MAT has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of -4.89%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-4.62%
31.47%
MAT
HTGC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Mattel, Inc.

Hercules Capital, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MAT vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MAT, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MAT, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MAT, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MAT, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.000.20
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MAT, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.02
HTGC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 3.08, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.003.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 3.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.002.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 12.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.17

MAT vs. HTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MAT and HTGC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.43
3.08
MAT
HTGC

Dividends

MAT vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.65%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.92%5.52%5.59%4.91%3.03%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
9.65%11.40%14.90%9.34%9.57%9.49%11.40%9.45%8.79%10.17%8.33%6.77%

Drawdowns

MAT vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAT drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than HTGC's maximum drawdown of -68.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAT and HTGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-51.31%
0
MAT
HTGC

Volatility

MAT vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

Mattel, Inc. (MAT) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) at 3.72%. This indicates that MAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
6.13%
3.72%
MAT
HTGC

Financials

MAT vs. HTGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mattel, Inc. and Hercules Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items