PortfoliosLab logo
MAT vs. HTGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MAT and HTGC is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MAT vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MAT:

0.19

HTGC:

-0.07

Sortino Ratio

MAT:

0.57

HTGC:

0.11

Omega Ratio

MAT:

1.08

HTGC:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

MAT:

0.11

HTGC:

-0.05

Martin Ratio

MAT:

0.61

HTGC:

-0.12

Ulcer Index

MAT:

11.32%

HTGC:

10.19%

Daily Std Dev

MAT:

43.47%

HTGC:

26.22%

Max Drawdown

MAT:

-83.67%

HTGC:

-68.30%

Current Drawdown

MAT:

-51.92%

HTGC:

-16.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAT:

$6.27B

HTGC:

$3.10B

EPS

MAT:

$1.50

HTGC:

$1.31

PE Ratio

MAT:

12.63

HTGC:

13.31

PEG Ratio

MAT:

1.95

HTGC:

0.52

PS Ratio

MAT:

1.16

HTGC:

6.30

PB Ratio

MAT:

2.94

HTGC:

1.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAT:

$5.40B

HTGC:

$388.30M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAT:

$2.75B

HTGC:

$322.74M

EBITDA (TTM)

MAT:

$901.07M

HTGC:

$249.43M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAT achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly higher than HTGC's -8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MAT has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of -1.77%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.35% annualized return.


MAT

YTD

6.82%

1M

19.19%

6M

-0.42%

1Y

8.35%

3Y*

-8.98%

5Y*

15.51%

10Y*

-1.77%

HTGC

YTD

-8.51%

1M

0.75%

6M

-2.90%

1Y

-1.88%

3Y*

19.83%

5Y*

21.74%

10Y*

14.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Mattel, Inc.

Hercules Capital, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MAT vs. HTGC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MAT is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MAT is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MAT is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MAT is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MAT is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MAT is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

HTGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HTGC is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HTGC is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HTGC is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HTGC is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HTGC is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HTGC is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MAT vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is higher than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAT and HTGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MAT vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.08%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.92%5.52%5.59%4.91%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
9.08%7.96%11.40%14.90%9.34%9.57%9.49%11.40%9.34%8.58%9.93%8.13%

Drawdowns

MAT vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAT drawdown since its inception was -83.67%, which is greater than HTGC's maximum drawdown of -68.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAT and HTGC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MAT vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

Mattel, Inc. (MAT) has a higher volatility of 13.35% compared to Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) at 5.75%. This indicates that MAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MAT vs. HTGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mattel, Inc. and Hercules Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
826.60M
102.10M
(MAT) Total Revenue
(HTGC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MAT vs. HTGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mattel, Inc. and Hercules Capital, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
49.4%
86.4%
(MAT) Gross Margin
(HTGC) Gross Margin
MAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mattel, Inc. reported a gross profit of 408.10M and revenue of 826.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.4%.

HTGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 88.19M and revenue of 102.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.4%.

MAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mattel, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.20M and revenue of 826.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

HTGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.76M and revenue of 102.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.6%.

MAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mattel, Inc. reported a net income of -40.30M and revenue of 826.60M, resulting in a net margin of -4.9%.

HTGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported a net income of 50.34M and revenue of 102.10M, resulting in a net margin of 49.3%.