MAT vs. HAS
Compare and contrast key facts about Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MAT or HAS.
Key characteristics
| MAT | HAS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.59% | 29.14% |
| 1Y Return | 14.44% | 34.31% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.06% | -8.96% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.60% | -5.38% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -4.89% | 4.96% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Daily Std Dev | 26.67% | 35.56% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.65% | -74.40% |
| Current Drawdown | -51.31% | -38.66% |
Fundamentals
| MAT | HAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.21B | $7.69B |
| EPS | $0.60 | -$10.73 |
| PE Ratio | 30.08 | 18.82 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.16 | 0.78 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.44B | $5.00B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.49B | $2.92B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $818.15M | $574.50M |
Correlation
The correlation between MAT and HAS is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MAT vs. HAS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MAT achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than HAS's 29.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MAT has underperformed HAS with an annualized return of -4.89%, while HAS has yielded a comparatively higher 4.96% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MAT vs. HAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MAT vs. HAS - Dividend Comparison
MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAT Mattel, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 5.52% | 5.59% | 4.91% | 3.03% |
HAS Hasbro, Inc. | 4.31% | 5.48% | 4.56% | 2.67% | 2.91% | 2.53% | 3.03% | 2.44% | 2.56% | 2.69% | 3.07% | 2.18% |
Drawdowns
MAT vs. HAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAT drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than HAS's maximum drawdown of -74.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAT and HAS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MAT vs. HAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) is 6.13%, while Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that MAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MAT vs. HAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mattel, Inc. and Hasbro, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities