MAT vs. HAS
MAT (Mattel, Inc.) and HAS (Hasbro, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Leisure industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, MAT returned -6.81%/yr vs 4.98%/yr for HAS. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MAT vs. HAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAT achieves a -23.94% return, which is significantly lower than HAS's 16.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MAT has underperformed HAS with an annualized return of -6.81%, while HAS has yielded a comparatively higher 4.98% annualized return.
MAT
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 13.12%
- 6M
- -27.76%
- YTD
- -23.94%
- 1Y
- -10.50%
- 3Y*
- -10.81%
- 5Y*
- -7.03%
- 10Y*
- -6.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.32%
HAS
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 1Y
- 30.11%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
HAS Hasbro, Inc. | $287.94M | $217.60M | $192.53M |
MAT Mattel, Inc. | $60.26M | $70.27M | $66.02M |
MAT vs. HAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAT Mattel, Inc. | -23.94% | 11.90% | -6.09% | 5.83% | -17.25% | 23.55% | 28.78% | 35.64% | -35.05% | -41.86% |
HAS Hasbro, Inc. | 16.30% | 52.52% | 14.76% | -11.95% | -37.93% | 11.90% | -8.42% | 33.41% | -8.20% | 19.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAT and HAS is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984 | 0.43 |
The correlation between MAT and HAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MAT:
$4.39B
HAS:
$13.29B
MAT:
$1.62
HAS:
$5.57
MAT:
9.33
HAS:
16.85
MAT:
1.00
HAS:
1.00
MAT:
0.86
HAS:
2.69
MAT:
1.78
HAS:
18.42
MAT:
$5.38B
HAS:
$4.97B
MAT:
$2.59B
HAS:
$3.50B
MAT:
$775.15M
HAS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAT vs. HAS — Risk / Return Rank
MAT
HAS
MAT vs. HAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAT | HAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.20 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 1.07 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 2.73 | -3.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAT vs. HAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAT drawdown since its inception was -83.68%, which is greater than HAS's maximum drawdown of -74.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAT and HAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAT | HAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.68% | -74.17% | -9.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.11% | -27.31% | -13.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.53% | -40.27% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.61% | -55.05% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.44% | -63.84% | -13.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.70% | -9.98% | -51.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.43% | -24.41% | -17.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.82% | 10.72% | +12.10% |
Volatility
MAT vs. HAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) is 10.80%, while Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) has a volatility of 12.46%. This indicates that MAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAT | HAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.80% | 12.46% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.65% | 25.75% | +8.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.57% | 30.45% | +8.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.96% | 32.85% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.87% | 34.05% | +7.82% |
Dividends
MAT vs. HAS - Dividend Comparison
MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAS Hasbro, Inc. | 2.98% | 3.41% | 5.01% | 5.48% | 4.56% | 2.67% | 2.91% | 2.53% | 3.03% | 2.44% | 2.56% | 2.69% |
MAT Mattel, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 5.52% | 5.59% |
Financials
MAT vs. HAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mattel, Inc. and Hasbro, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MAT vs. HAS - Profitability Comparison
MAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mattel, Inc. reported a gross profit of 386.80M and revenue of 862.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.9%.
HAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 867.20M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.1%.
MAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mattel, Inc. reported an operating income of -9.80M and revenue of 862.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.1%.
HAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported an operating income of 252.50M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.
MAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mattel, Inc. reported a net income of 61.00M and revenue of 862.20M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
HAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a net income of 160.90M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MAT and HAS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAS has higher volatility (12.46%) compared to MAT (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAT dropped -83.68% vs HAS's -74.17%.
HAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAT and HAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer