PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MAT vs. HAS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MAT and HAS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

MAT vs. HAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1,025.89%
3,421.93%
MAT
HAS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MAT:

-0.15

HAS:

0.72

Sortino Ratio

MAT:

-0.00

HAS:

1.27

Omega Ratio

MAT:

1.00

HAS:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

MAT:

-0.08

HAS:

0.37

Martin Ratio

MAT:

-0.56

HAS:

3.13

Ulcer Index

MAT:

8.72%

HAS:

6.62%

Daily Std Dev

MAT:

31.83%

HAS:

28.67%

Max Drawdown

MAT:

-81.65%

HAS:

-74.40%

Current Drawdown

MAT:

-54.66%

HAS:

-43.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAT:

$6.36B

HAS:

$8.39B

EPS

MAT:

$1.57

HAS:

-$4.64

PEG Ratio

MAT:

1.28

HAS:

0.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAT:

$5.35B

HAS:

$4.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAT:

$2.66B

HAS:

$2.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

MAT:

$882.78M

HAS:

-$186.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAT achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly lower than HAS's 18.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MAT has underperformed HAS with an annualized return of -3.74%, while HAS has yielded a comparatively higher 3.70% annualized return.


MAT

YTD

-5.40%

1M

-2.67%

6M

0.22%

1Y

-6.25%

5Y*

5.92%

10Y*

-3.74%

HAS

YTD

18.19%

1M

-6.90%

6M

-5.45%

1Y

18.14%

5Y*

-7.58%

10Y*

3.70%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MAT vs. HAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MAT, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.150.72
The chart of Sortino ratio for MAT, currently valued at -0.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.001.27
The chart of Omega ratio for MAT, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.001.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for MAT, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.080.37
The chart of Martin ratio for MAT, currently valued at -0.56, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-0.563.13
MAT
HAS

The current MAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the HAS Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAT and HAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.15
0.72
MAT
HAS

Dividends

MAT vs. HAS - Dividend Comparison

MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.92%5.52%5.59%4.91%3.03%
HAS
Hasbro, Inc.
4.86%5.48%4.56%2.67%2.91%2.53%3.03%2.44%2.56%2.69%3.07%2.18%

Drawdowns

MAT vs. HAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAT drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than HAS's maximum drawdown of -74.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAT and HAS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-54.66%
-43.86%
MAT
HAS

Volatility

MAT vs. HAS - Volatility Comparison

Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) have volatilities of 8.61% and 8.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.61%
8.51%
MAT
HAS

Financials

MAT vs. HAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mattel, Inc. and Hasbro, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab