MAT vs. HAS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS).

Performance

MAT vs. HAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAT vs. HAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MAT Mattel, Inc.	-26.76%	11.90%	-6.09%	5.83%	-17.25%	23.55%	28.78%	35.64%	-35.05%	-41.86%
HAS Hasbro, Inc.	14.93%	52.52%	14.76%	-11.95%	-37.93%	11.90%	-8.42%	33.41%	-8.20%	19.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MAT : $4.44B HAS : $13.35B
EPS MAT : $1.25 HAS : -$2.28
PS Ratio MAT : 0.86 HAS : 2.82
PB Ratio MAT : 1.72 HAS : 23.60
Total Revenue (TTM) MAT : $5.35B HAS : $4.70B
Gross Profit (TTM) MAT : $2.61B HAS : $3.34B
EBITDA (TTM) MAT : $740.16M HAS : $175.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAT achieves a -26.76% return, which is significantly lower than HAS's 14.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MAT has underperformed HAS with an annualized return of -7.52%, while HAS has yielded a comparatively higher 5.14% annualized return.

MAT

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -14.28%
• YTD: -26.76%
• 6M: -13.67%
• 1Y: -25.22%
• 3Y*: -7.59%
• 5Y*: -6.40%
• 10Y*: -7.52%

HAS

• 1D: 4.71%
• 1M: -6.01%
• YTD: 14.93%
• 6M: 25.41%
• 1Y: 57.67%
• 3Y*: 25.76%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 5.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MAT vs. HAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAT

MAT Risk / Return Rank: 17
MAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MAT Omega Ratio Rank: 19
MAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

HAS

HAS Risk / Return Rank: 87
HAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
HAS Omega Ratio Rank: 87
HAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
HAS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAT vs. HAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAT	HAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	1.69	-2.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.41	2.42	-2.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.35	-0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	3.14	-3.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.67	9.43	-11.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAT vs. HAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the HAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAT and HAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAT	HAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.53	1.69	-2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	0.11	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.18	0.15	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.31	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between MAT and HAS is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MAT vs. HAS - Dividend Comparison

MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAT Mattel, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	5.52%	5.59%
HAS Hasbro, Inc.	2.99%	3.41%	5.01%	5.48%	4.56%	2.67%	2.91%	2.53%	3.03%	2.44%	2.56%	2.69%

Drawdowns

MAT vs. HAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAT drawdown since its inception was -83.68%, which is greater than HAS's maximum drawdown of -74.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAT and HAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAT	HAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.68%	-74.17%	-9.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.10%	-19.11%	-16.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.50%	-55.05%	+7.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.44%	-63.84%	-13.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.12%	-11.04%	-52.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.27%	-24.48%	-16.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.79%	6.36%	+8.43%

Volatility

MAT vs. HAS - Volatility Comparison

Mattel, Inc. (MAT) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) have volatilities of 7.57% and 7.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAT	HAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.57%	7.40%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.04%	19.11%	+17.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.06%	34.36%	+13.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.23%	32.19%	+5.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.87%	33.61%	+8.26%

Financials

MAT vs. HAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mattel, Inc. and Hasbro, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mattel, Inc. reported a gross profit of 810.40M and revenue of 1.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.

HAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 1.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.4%.

MAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mattel, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.10M and revenue of 1.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

HAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.50M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

MAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mattel, Inc. reported a net income of 106.20M and revenue of 1.77B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

HAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a net income of 201.60M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.