PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MASI vs. MMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MASI vs. MMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Masimo Corporation (MASI) and Maximus, Inc. (MMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MASI achieves a 37.46% return, which is significantly higher than MMS's -29.63% return. Over the past 10 years, MASI has outperformed MMS with an annualized return of 13.60%, while MMS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.95% annualized return.


MASI

1D
0.03%
1M
0.32%
YTD
37.46%
6M
29.47%
1Y
9.13%
3Y*
3.06%
5Y*
-3.28%
10Y*
13.60%

MMS

1D
-1.28%
1M
-6.30%
YTD
-29.63%
6M
-28.42%
1Y
-14.72%
3Y*
-8.84%
5Y*
-6.46%
10Y*
1.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MASI vs. MMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MASI
Masimo Corporation
37.46%-21.32%41.03%-20.78%-49.47%9.09%69.80%47.21%26.62%25.82%
MMS
Maximus, Inc.
-29.63%17.47%-9.70%16.01%-6.39%10.31%-0.07%15.90%-8.53%28.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MASI and MMS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2007

0.34

The correlation between MASI and MMS shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MASI:

$9.40B

MMS:

$3.30B

EPS

MASI:

$1.41

MMS:

$6.66

PE Ratio

MASI:

126.53

MMS:

9.03

PS Ratio

MASI:

6.19

MMS:

0.63

PB Ratio

MASI:

11.92

MMS:

1.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

MASI:

$1.56B

MMS:

$5.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MASI:

$962.00M

MMS:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

MASI:

$336.40M

MMS:

$654.04M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MASI vs. MMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MASI
MASI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MASI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MASI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

MMS
MMS Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MASI vs. MMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Masimo Corporation (MASI) and Maximus, Inc. (MMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MASIMMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.94

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

-0.37

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.71

-0.81

+1.51

MASI vs. MMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MASI Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the MMS Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MASI and MMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MASIMMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

-0.47

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

-0.23

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.07

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.31

+0.04

Drawdowns

MASI vs. MMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MASI drawdown since its inception was -74.70%, which is greater than MMS's maximum drawdown of -61.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASI and MMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MASIMMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.70%

-61.45%

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.92%

-39.65%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.83%

-39.65%

-14.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.70%

-39.75%

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.70%

-40.40%

-34.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.05%

-38.60%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.22%

-16.88%

-10.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.96%

18.29%

-5.33%

Volatility

MASI vs. MMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Masimo Corporation (MASI) is 0.44%, while Maximus, Inc. (MMS) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that MASI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MASIMMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

9.34%

-8.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.88%

27.41%

+5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.52%

31.66%

+12.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.79%

27.72%

+17.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.74%

27.59%

+10.15%

Dividends

MASI vs. MMS - Dividend Comparison

MASI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MASI
Masimo Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MMS
Maximus, Inc.
2.10%1.39%1.61%1.36%1.53%1.41%1.53%1.38%0.59%0.25%0.32%0.32%

Financials

MASI vs. MMS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Masimo Corporation and Maximus, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
403.60M
1.31B
(MASI) Total Revenue
(MMS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MASI vs. MMS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Masimo Corporation and Maximus, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
62.1%
27.8%
Portfolio components
MASI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masimo Corporation reported a gross profit of 250.80M and revenue of 403.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.1%.

MMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Maximus, Inc. reported a gross profit of 362.56M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.

MASI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masimo Corporation reported an operating income of 77.40M and revenue of 403.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

MMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Maximus, Inc. reported an operating income of 148.49M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

MASI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masimo Corporation reported a net income of 57.10M and revenue of 403.60M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.

MMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Maximus, Inc. reported a net income of 98.06M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MASI and MMS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMS has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to MASI (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MASI dropped -74.70% vs MMS's -61.45%.

MASI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MASI and MMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer